Imagine imprisoning the people who are responsible for bringing new, functional adults to our society for the inane crime of teaching.
The scary part about it is, they probably don’t believe that is what they’re doing at all. I’d wager almost all of the people getting behind this are people who believe that the responsibility of bringing new, functional adults to society is the sole purview of the church.
Who better to arrest? The Republicans want to infect the minds of the kids and purging/silencing the teachers who don’t comply makes sense.
They are trying to “bring God back into schools”. Ted Cruz’s dad is involved with a PAC that’s trying to via school boards.
Well, when education is kind of a problem for your plans of building a third world country…
I wouldn’t necessarily say third world, as that would imply the rich would be losing money as well, but I understand what you mean.
Although that being said, the richest people on the planet tend to be complete fucking imbeciles themselves (Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Tim Cook, etc.)
Third world countries can have rich people, too. Usually the government officials.
Third world countries have some ridiculously rich people.
I guess someone needs to open up a Readeasy…
Thats called piracy
could you imagine having so much time on your hands that you debase the entire intellectual potential of your tribe, town, city, what have you, just by being a self righteous prick about pieces of paper with words printed on them?
i was just in another thread. and for some reason. people take HUGE offense to being knowledgeable. like if you try to climb out of the ignorant bucket but you almost can’t because the other crabs pull us back down.
you could rape a mans wife, flay his children before his eyes and he wouldn’t lift a finger to object, but say you have a book? and this book teaches you stuff? oh, that’s greater than any sin imaginable (the best part is i didn’t mention what book, but id love to hear everyone’s ‘self righteous’ projections about which one)
Drrrrrraaamaaaaaaa.
Ok, so we’ve just never followed where the first amendment says there will be no national religion
No, we’re too busy furiously masturbating to the second amendment. After all, that’s the only one that counts!
No you see it wasn’t religious because it didn’t require teaching anything else, just not teaching evolution. Also since some church folk support evolution and other church folk don’t it can’t be religious for that either.
Seriously though, for anyone unfamiliar with Christian dogma, according to them humans were divinely made in God’s image. The state supreme court wasn’t even trying to be impartial.
Never change, Florida.
Everything stays, right where you left it.
The more things change.
I expect school fire drills are gonna be a bit different now…
Scheduled for 4:51 pm?
Was not expecting that 2nd paragraph.
The comment section confuses me. Is this picture just a reminder how things were in 1925? Or is teaching evolution now banned in Florida?
This is an event from the past which is being echoed in the present.
It’s strange, I know… sometimes people look at the past to better assess how to handle the present or to better know what to expect from the future.
Alright, thanks for the answer. I found the snarky addition pretty unecessary. What’s up with people here? So much hostility around.
I tried to understand the image and asked for help. Got it, thanked. Where’s the need for downvotes or sarcasm in that?
Maybe that is living “A Boring Dystopia”, but I think we can and should do better.
I think it’s because you were mistaken for a concern troll, “just asking questions” but intended to not people down.
From your first response, it wasn’t possible to tell if you genuinely wanted more information, or were gearing up for some bad faith arguments.
I hate to put so much thought and disclaimers into simple questions but I understand where this is coming from. It’s alright.
I mean at first glance I see a title for an article, a short description of the scope of the article and a picture from a past article that echoes the same concept.
This article (I haven’t seen it linked) is likely about books being banned.
What’s with the snarky replies? Well, you seem to be asking in bad faith and are being treated as such. I’m sorry if that’s in error. If you’re genuinely asking these questions it’s a safe assumption having it explained clearly might help you. If you can sense the “snark” you can certainly parse the topic of this article from the screenshot.
you seem to be asking in bad faith and are being treated as such. I’m sorry if that’s in error.
Yes, it was a genuine question. I hope this community isn’t always that way.
Don’t worry, I understood you had a question and wasn’t sure why you were downvoted. Seriously just don’t worry about the downvotes, it’s 2023 there’s going to be snark on the internet
Teachers were giving kids actual pornography. Sorry, as a parent, I have a right to demand my children not be taught how to give gay blowjobs with graphic illustrations. You went too far, and now you have to stop. Cry all you want. Most people are not okay with your degeneracy.
Edit: one of the “children’s” books is called “Gender Queer,” and includes graphic illustrations of sex.
None of the books being banned are pornographic. Don’t fucking lie to advance your cause of genocide
Prove your claim. What book? Where? Or are you just making this up or maybe repeating some bullshit some other moron said?
I’d imagine gay blowjobs are the same process as hetero blowjobs.
Hey! No imagination allowed! Cut that out.
Maybe next time try thinking a little more than not at all. What’s the name of the book? Oh you can’t tell me cuz there isnt one. You gobble up this political rhetoric without a second thought cuz thinking is hard.
I respect that you’ve provided something to back your claim up, but have you actually seen the uncensored version yet?
It’s not what you’re claiming - it’s about how someone born female has been fantasising what it would be like to have male genitals. The ‘gay blowjob’ is the character finally trying on a strap on - which is pretty obvious in both the text and uncensored image, and then deciding pretty immediately that the fantasy was much better than the reality.
There is a reason that websites are censoring it when they show it, and it isn’t because they’re protecting you. It’s because a half truth is much more powerful than a all-out lie, and by censoring parts out, it allows the readers to fill in the blanks with something much worse. They’re deliberately trying to deceive you, to rile you up, and keep you coming back to them.
if we’re randomly accusing people of being pedophiles without proof, I’d start with the guy bringing up CSAM unprovoked ya know
Oh, so straight blow jobs would be ok?
Not for nothing but gay blow jobs are practically the same as straight ones and I don’t need a book to teach me that. Also heavy doubt that that is the case
No, no. Straight blowjobs don’t exist. It’s eyes closed missionary position, or else straight to hell.
Unless you’re Boebert
I avoid hell by doing it in the ear.
Between a Man and Wife who are only suffering the degeneracy to procreate.
Prove it.
You are lying
Who did this? Bullshit.
That seems your source sound entirely made up to get a certain delight riled up. I’d you are a victim of this misinformation please do some deeper research. If you’re just a pusher of disinformation I’m really disappointed.
Please provide a source.
If there is a source, and I’d be shocked if there was, it’s a one off thing that should be dealt with as such. There was absolutely not plural “teachers” defiling our youth with porn in school. This whole thing is fear mongering to create an out group for conservatives to rally against
Yeah, I understand that. It’s the same with the whole kidnapping bs that’s being spouted across social media right now.
Lol, someone came through and down voted instead of actually providing a source.
What is this kidnapping story?
It’s not a story but a bunch of women who claim that someone tried to kidnap them in broad daylight in a busy parking lot. Or tried to grab their kids. It’s always “someone” and never an actual description of a person. All the details are extremely vague. “Oh there was a van following me to my car!” “This guy was following me and he was wearing glasses so I couldn’t see his face!” It’s always these middle class white women too, which human traffickers don’t go after. They’ll take pictures of random vehicles and come up with fake ass stories about how the vehicle was following them, acting weird, blah blah. Oh and they never call the police. They just write long ass posts on social media about what almost happened to them.
Here’s an article on the topic. Idk who the author is, but the article is pretty accurate about what’s going on.
Sure if they did I’d agree, but this never ever happened so why do you claim it did?
