Swedish human rights activist Anna Ardin is glad Julian Assange is free.

But the claims she has made about him suggest she would have every reason not to wish him well.

Ardin is fiercely proud of Assange’s work for WikiLeaks, and insists that it should never have landed him behind bars.

“We have the right to know about the wars that are fought in our name,” she says.

Speaking to Ardin over Zoom in Stockholm, it quickly becomes clear that she has no problem keeping what she sees as the two Assanges apart in her head - the visionary activist and the man who she says does not treat women well.

She is at pains to describe him neither as a hero nor a monster, but a complicated man.

  • Senal@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    No problem. Outside perspectives are usually interesting to explore.

    I hate the idea that I’m falling for some sort of pseudoscience and weigh that against (a) how it tangibly helped me, and (b) whether we simply haven’t found the proper way to test its efficacy properly

    Perhaps a different approach might help.

    [ I will caveat the following with : i am not , in any way, qualified to give any psychological advice or medical suggestions, this is not that, it’s just my personal opinion. ]


    Rather than try and figure out if the test itself is flawed or not, look at the outcome instead.

    Based on how you described it, it wasn’t the specific methodology itself that was helpful to you.

    You can take whatever positives you experienced and explore them completely independently.

    Does it matter that you used a potentially flawed methodology to come to a useful conclusion about yourself ?