• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think there are other possible conclusions that are less about anything good and more about destroying perceived enemies.

    I’m not talking about those actions. Hamas has participated in too many good faith negotiations, both with Israel and the PNA, for an organization that only cares about its own existence. See for example: 2013-2014 unity government, 2008 ceasefire, 2012-2013 ceasefire.

    While I support a Two State Solution, I don’t think this is good strategy for accomplishing it, and is far more likely to accelerate the destruction of the Palestinian people.

    Then what do you suggest instead?

    I don’t see hamas as freedom fighters at all. I see them as misguided jihadists with an effective propaganda wing and a savvy sense for politics.

    I mean they produce results. You can think there are better ways (I don’t see them, but maybe they exist), but you can’t argue with results.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The results are exactly what I’m concerned with. As I said, I think the result for the Palestinian people is going to be a worsening of the situation for Palestinians. Not a bettering. More dead and less rights. Not more rights and freedoms.

      That said, I do not have any ideas for how to actually accomplish a two state solution.

      I also don’t see how engaging in good faith negotiations automatically makes them working for a good cause. Anyone can engage in negotiations any time it benefits them to do so.