• halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because it’s a group of narcissists. They were too worried about themselves. None of them had the courage to say “I’m willing to not go home tonight so these kids can.”

    Actually I’d bet that a bunch said that, but didn’t actually do anything about it.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is what pisses me off the most. 376, and you can’t storm the room? 376? And you refuse to trade one for any of those children who needed protecting? These are supposedly the hard calculations they have to make and they all unilaterally chose themselves? Enforcers will always be useless to anybody but the property owners. They aren’t actually here to protect anybody. They should have made the call, and traded 20 of themselves so those kids didn’t have to die. Thats the hard call we expect these “hard asses” to make.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can’t remember the study but basically the bystander effect is a thing. The more people there are in a group, the more likely it is that no one will do anything because everyone will assume that someone else will do something.

        This isn’t to excuse officers because they are specifically trained that they are that someone. The fact that they were held back from entering is willful, malicious, and negligent.

        The fact that the officers actually complied instead of disobeying orders especially when seconds turned to minutes, is cowardice.

        And a reminder that I believe the police chief and mayor of the town was reelected by the town.