• biribiri11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can’t believe he figured it out. What a shame. Guess we’ll have to go provoke another country to invade our fellow flourishing independent democracies, who play a key role in the world’s trade.

    Seriously though, I hope he’s just giving himself an easy out here. There’s always too much war going on.

  • yokonzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Uh … Yeah you got us… All a trick, darn guess our dastardly plan failed and you won’t invade Taiwan now

      • filoria@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        5 months ago

        With US troops?

        Ukraine has a right to defend itself, but US troops are not deployed in Ukraine.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m talking about Taiwan, but Ukrainians are defending themselves with American weapons, intelligence and training.

          I believe it was released that there are 14 special force members in Ukraine as well.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Green Berets are the army’s spec ops that focus on training foreign fighters, specially chosen for things like foreign language proficiency. They’re not Rangers or general light infantry. Ideally they’re not really supposed to get into direct combat, as they’re rather time consuming and difficult to replace.

          I would bet a whole bunch of money that we actually do have Green Berets present in Ukraine as well, though the only people that would know that for sure would be the US govt, the Ukrainians and probably Russian intelligence.

          If the 101st Airborne gets deployed to Taiwan, then I’d be worried.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Green Berets are just as worrying. It means US is training locals, preparing for yet another proxy war or brutal crackdown on any real or potential opposition against place being subjugated to US empire.

      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        59
        ·
        5 months ago

        It doesn’t. The vast majority of countries recognize the PRC having sovereignty over Taiwan, as does the UN. There is no right to separatism or anything like that. Rather the PRC has the right to enforce their sovereignty. The US btw has no right to send to troops into China, that’s an act of war.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              If you are talking about the President of Taiwan, are you comparing a role that’s existed since 1 January 1912 (25 October 1945 in its current form) to one that existed 18 February 1861 – 5 May 1865 and had exactly one officeholder?

              • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                5 months ago

                They are. And they’re comparing glorious revolutionary China to the dastardly imperialist pig dogs in the US.

                Tankies are a confused bunch.

          • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            5 months ago

            The right to self-determination does not mean a right to an independent state or any right to secede.

            Also I’m not a fan of creating a new national identity just so the US can claim part of China for its puppet regime. That’s using nationalism for a colonial divide-and-conquer strategy, that’s pretty much the opposite of liberation and self-determination.

            • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              The right of self-determination means that a nation may arrange its life in the way it wishes. It has the right to arrange its life on the basis of autonomy. It has the right to enter into federal relations with other nations. It has the right to complete secession. Nations are sovereign, and all nations have equal rights.

              Stalin, Marxism and the National Question

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      First link: Members of A Company, so you’re looking at 100 people maximum and likely less. Not exactly a large fighting force.

      Second link: There’s nothing “quiet” about it. It’s been blaring on Western News non-stop for about 6 years now. The US has been completely open about weapons sales and training schedules.

      Third link: We gave President Tsai Ing-Wen a medal. Okay, and?

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s amazing that this gets any downvotes at all.

          Washington Post 1991: Innocence Abroad: the New World of Spyless Coups

          “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA,” agrees [NED cofounder Allen] Weinstein.

          New York Times, 1997: Political Meddling by Outsiders: Not New for U.S.

          The National Endowment for Democracy, created 15 years ago to do in the open what the Central Intelligence Agency has done surreptitiously for decades, spends $30 million a year to support things like political parties, labor unions, dissident movements and the news media in dozens of countries, including China.

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        not a fighting force

        Genuine question, I know tone is hard to read online but I promise I’m not trying to be snarky: do you know the role that special forces in general and green berets in particular play in US proxy wars? They don’t fight, they raise and train local militias how to do insurgency and kill political enemies. Anytime green berets are in a country next door to an enemy of the US empire, it’s because they’re training the next ARVN, Taliban or Azov Battalion.

      • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fuck off

        No you; the argument was never that Taiwan is independent, even our government has never acknowledged that; only utter imbeciles ever thought that was the case.

        • coolusername@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The KMT doesn’t represent Taiwan. Tsai, obviously the former president, has already said that Taiwan is already independent and doesn’t need to “declare independence”. China’s position is 100% LARP. Their claim is that they already own Taiwan, which makes no sense at all.

          There are basically ZERO pundits anywhere that know the history of Taiwan. They either parrot same NAFO-type propaganda or CPC propaganda – which is basically that Taiwan is an “inalienable part of China”, which is simply historically false. Throughout most of Chinese history none of the leaders gave two shits about the island of Taiwan until it became part of an important trade route. THEN the Qing dynasty started to administer very very small parts of it. They were later forced to give up their rule on those parts of Taiwan to imperial Japan for many reasons (yes, imperial Japan is bad). Afterwards, there still wasn’t much of a concern for taking Taiwan, either from the CPC nor the KMT. It only started happening after KMT lost their war and started claiming Taiwan was theirs and planning their escape plan. Shortly afterwards, the CPC said Taiwan was there’s as well.

          In the bigger picture, aboriginal Taiwanese have arrived at Taiwan in various periods, starting around 6000 years ago. The vast majority of “Chinese” that came to Taiwan came starting around the 1600’s due to the Dutch East Indian company encouraging immigration from China and later on the Qing dynasty encouraged immigration as well (1800’s). CPC propaganda makes it seem like “Chinese” presence in Taiwan all came from the KMT fleeing to Taiwan or something. The KMT and all of their descendants only make up less than ONE FIFTH of the population of Taiwan.

          Anyway I skipped over a lot of history including Dutch atrocities in Taiwan, a Ming loyalist dispelling the Dutch, and the Spanish colonization of (small parts) of Taiwan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Formosa
          Taiwanese identity is also very important and unlike what the CPC says, it’s not about being “anti-Chinese” or “not Chinese”, which makes no sense.

          Also, what does being loyal to “China” actually mean? The Ming dynasty had conflicts with the Qing dynasty, which one was more Chinese? Is the CPC responsible for everything bad previous dynasties did? Should the CPC take responsibility for KMT atrocities?? If no, why not? Do they own all the land that previous dynasties have owned? Does the CPC own all land that Chinese people live on? (Chinese nationalists actually use the ethnostate argument as a reason as to why the CPC should own Taiwan).

              • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 months ago

                Is the US among it? And why are they choosing to arm Taiwan instead? Do you think the US would be chill if another country decided to arm Hawaii,Puerto Rico, Alaska,… ?

                • coolusername@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  FYI the weapons are basically shit (there’s agreement among Taiwanese and Chinese nationalists) and can’t be used for force projection at all. In Taiwan purchasing of these arms is considered paying protection money to the mafia. In the US it’s spun as helping Taiwan protect itself against China. In China it’s spun as the US interfering with China’s “internal affairs” since they’re larping as owning Taiwan.

                  I do agree that the US is trying to bait China into attacking Taiwan though. The special forces in Kinmen to train kids (they’re probably <23 years old) to pilot microdrones? LMAO. I’m not sure if CIA intelligence (as opposed to operations) even know the actual reason of why China wants to claim Taiwan. They may believe in their own propaganda.

        • coolusername@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The KMT doesn’t represent Taiwan. The CPC should have finished them off/sent them to jail. Mao was for Taiwanese independene from it’s Japanese colonizers.

        • Stitch0815@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Wait let me quickly turn to the left and ask my taiwanese coworker

          She says your full of shit and should go back to licking boots in silence

      • Kumikommunism [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        So the southern US is its own independent country right? The losing side of civil wars gets to keep “their” land? (Actually this is being too charitable to Taiwan, they actually invaded land and called it theirs)

        • coolusername@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          The KMT and CPC are both from China. The vast vast majority of Taiwanese are not KMT from China nor any of their descendants.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            5 months ago

            Unless you suggest that KMT is a nationality or ethnicity, 95-97% of Taiwan population is Han Chinese (mostly Hoklo and Hakka), and barely 2% are indigenous.

        • Stitch0815@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Wait let me quickly turn to the left and ask my taiwanese coworker

          She says your full of shit and should go back to licking boots in silence

    • randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Taiwan is its own country. I will never understand why some people outside China insist that Taiwan is a part of China.

      • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You think it’s absurd that some people think the Republic Of China is part of China?

        I get that names aren’t everything, but it reflects both the recent history and the de jure policies of the ROC, PRC, UN and USA.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t say that in Taiwan. You might get into trouble.

        Taiwan, or rather The Republic of China, claims to be the legitimate China. This includes all of the mainland. The losers of China’s civil war fled to Taiwan, but their claim to all of China continues.

        • randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          just fyi, I live in Taiwan, and people never get into trouble for saying that. don’t lecture me on how to behave in my homeland. now I know you didn’t know I lived here, but just maybe, maybe you should refrain from saying stuff you don’t know well enough about

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    The same Xi that violates Taiwan’s airspace continuously. That increases the airspace violations whenever Taiwan does something that he doesn’t like, like democratically electing pro-independence politicians or when US politicians visit Taiwan.

    Yeah sure Xi, the only reason you threaten Taiwan’s democracy is because the US tricked you into it.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Chinese leader Xi Jinping has accused the US of trying to trick China into invading Taiwan, but he said it won’t take the bait, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

    According to the FT, Xi made the accusation during a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in April last year.

    Xi has issued the same warning to officials in his own country, one source told the FT, but this would be the first time he made the claim to a foreign leader, the outlet said.

    But the mood in Washington, DC, seems to be shifting, with Congress showing itself more “overtly supportive of Taiwan than only a few years ago,” Graeme Thomson, an analyst with the Eurasia Group, told BI in November.

    Last month, a US congressional delegation met with senior Taiwanese officials to discuss US-Taiwan relations, a few days after China conducted military drills around the island.

    During a meeting in April, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned US Secretary of State Antony Blinken not to cross China’s “red lines” on sovereignty, security, and development interests.


    The original article contains 555 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • CRUMBGRABBER@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    XI is way too smart to push deep into the nether regions of Taiwan, especially after being briefed by Wang.