LOS ANGELES – President Biden on Saturday night said he expects the winner of this year’s presidential election will likely have the chance to fill two vacancies on the Supreme Court – a decision he warned would be “one of the scariest parts” if his Republican opponent, former President Donald Trump, is successful in his bid for a second term.

  • Aphelion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Please give me a hypothetical example of how “the American people” can actually change the fundamental structure of the 3 branches of government. Like seriously, I would love to know how.

    • D1G17AL@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Constitutional Convention enacted by State Governors and State Legislatures with the support of the majority of each states population.

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        So if enough people in every state complained about SCOTUS to their state legislature, the state legislature can force the people’s opinion up to the Governors who can do something at the federal level? I guess I’m just not seeing the actual legal mechanism that would be used to force any kind of change.

        My understanding is any change to the structure of government at that level requires 2/3rds congressional majority.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And people act like “the people” want this in the first place. Nearly half of “The people” voted for Trump, and probably will again. The US is not united against the fascists. Hell, in this thread itself, you have someone blaming the Dems for not waving a magic wand and somehow assigning 6 more scotus memberswhen we don’t even have a majority in either the house or the senate, and taking such a drastic move with obvious dangers would certainly be objectionable to many.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Congratulations, the constitution now allows for the execution of gay people.

        I’m not sure how people don’t get this. There are already plenty of avenues for the creation of popular change in the current democratic system. The problems we have today largely exist because they are popular.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And how do we think that’d work out?

        If we really did get to rip up the Constitution and start over, who do you think would get to write it? You think Bernie Sanders is just going to stroll up with a pen and start setting things straight?