• Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s not actually true. It’s certainly a trigger, but it’s not the trigger of the firearm. The trigger assembly responsible for activation of the hammer and firing pin would remain unaltered, but the button would activate some kind of rotating and/or vibrating apparatus which engages the trigger assembly over and over and over in rapid succession. They go into a lot of detail about this in the opinion, including the definitions they’re referencing with the word “trigger” (pp 7-14).

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re correct went back and reread it:

      On weapons with these standard trigger mechanisms, the phrase “function of the trigger” means the physical trigger movement required to shoot the firearm. Pg. 7

      Although it sounds like there maybe be edge cases where specially designed firearms are treated differently if they lack a traditional mechanism.

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think you’re right. I don’t think we’re far removed from a computer being attached to a firing pin such that electrical impulses cause microvibrations which force a firing pin into a cartridge with unimaginable rapidity. In that case, there’d be no trigger mechanism at all except a button and a microprocessor, and so our definitions will have to adapt rapidly to avoid unimaginable bloodshed.