• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t wait for them to finally accept climate change is man made, except inexplicably blaming trees and renewables for destroying the climate while promoting a cooling effect from fossil fuels… Whatever it is, it’s guaranteed to be evil and dumb as shit.

      • cedarmesa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its a pattern. Youll notice regressives while almost wholly subsisting on lies arent sophisticated liars. The vast bulk of the time they just look at the facts of the matter and state the opposite. Same with the projection game. If Im doing something illegal, immoral, reprehensible just accuse someone else of the exact thing im doing. Which is why im especially concerned with their new found love of kneejerk calling their detractors pedophiles. Gonna be a dark day when those skeletons fall out of their overflowing closet.

    • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly: Net neutrality is a publicly acknowledged individual by small tech that wants to censor liberals.

    • False@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The EFF heavily criticized AWS for removing Parler a few years ago for this reason.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not Net Neutrality. Comcast stopping a subscriber from visiting Parlor hosted on AWS would be violating Net Neutrality. It’s about getting there, not where it’s hosted. Amazon is fully in their rights to dictate what is hosted on their platform.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m aware of their stance, and I disagree with it. Beyond that, it’s simply a different issue than Net Neutrality and they aren’t conflating the two. It’s important to understand the difference, especially because a large number of Americans have little to no choice in Internet Service Providers.

            It’s a kin to the water company refusing to provide water to a racist on your street. That’s wrong. Water is a utility and should be available to the home owner regardless. However, Walmart should not be obligated to stock water that racist bottles with racist slogans on it in their stores.