“Okay” with their existence. Not with protecting them from abuse and persecution.

I guess it depends on what kind of abuse we’re talking about… but in many places I believe just the cessation of abuse and persecution from the direction of the government would be a pretty big positive change. You don’t need protection beyond that, since violence is (and needs to be) already illegal.

It is why the silver bullet is, and always will be, “explain how orphanages work under libertarianism”

Can you elaborate? I don’t get what this is implying.