A new South Dakota policy to stop the use of gender pronouns by public university faculty and staff in official correspondence is also keeping Native American employees from listing their tribal affiliations in a state with a long and violent history of conflict with tribes.

Two University of South Dakota faculty members, Megan Red Shirt-Shaw and her husband, John Little, have long included their gender pronouns and tribal affiliations in their work email signature blocks. But both received written warnings from the university in March that doing so violated a policy adopted in December by the South Dakota Board of Regents.

“I was told that I had 5 days to remove my tribal affiliation and pronouns,” Little said in an email to The Associated Press. “I believe the exact wording was that I had ‘5 days to correct the behavior.’ If my tribal affiliation and pronouns were not removed after the 5 days, then administrators would meet and make a decision whether I would be suspended (with or without pay) and/or immediately terminated.”

The policy is billed by the board as a simple branding and communications policy. It came only months after Republican Gov. Kristi Noem sent a letter to the regents that railed against “liberal ideologies” on college campuses and called for the board to ban drag shows on campus and “remove all references to preferred pronouns in school materials,” among other things.

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s not what was posted. They said you are also fucking awful.

    But if you are scared to even question being called that, it is your right.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’re on social media. Sometimes people are a little carless with how they write, and are maybe a little more terse than they ought to be. Taking every post completely literally and not giving people the benefit of the doubt seems a bit silly. I take no umbrage with the statement, because I know who they’re talking about, and it’s not me. I have nothing to be scared of.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you not know how generalizations work or are you just that fucken brain damaged? If I say “Saxons are piss bathing dipshits” that doesnt mean I hate literally everyone from southern England at worst I just hate most of them. Learn what a generalization means or jump off a cliff I dont care what you do just stop being stupid.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        To be fair, we as a society have been moving away from generalizations when it comes to things people can’t control. It’s a fine line to walk.

    • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ll take the bear in case you were wondering too.

      Care to explain what an awful choice that is?