• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 months ago

    Someone at the justice department just found out how expensive seats at a Taylor Swift concert are, didn’t they?

  • Addv4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Justice dept also clarified in the same press release that, “Water is wet” and the sky is still currently blue.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      While I totally agree with you, fun semantic question, is water wet, or does it only make other things wet?

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So the crux of it is the definition of wet. A couple definitions: “covered or soaked with a liquid such as water” or “Not yet dry or firm”. While you could maybe argue water is “not yet dry”, that also implies the expectation that it will at some point be which it won’t, because if it’s “dry” it’s not water anymore. Similarly water is not “covered or soaked in a liquid” as it is a liquid. It’s a subtle point but highlights a quirk of English. A liquid almost by definition can’t be “wet” unless it also has a dry state (E.G. paint).

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    oh you noticed, like twenty years later

    maybe if we’re lucky in another twenty years you’ll notice what the capitalists have been doing

    farcical motherfuckers

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That takes about seventy years plus bloodshed and the history about it being whitewashed so it doesn’t seem that bad and someone else does it.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, was being brought with 30 state and district attorneys general and seeks to break up the monopoly they say is squeezing out smaller promoters and hurting artists.

    The Justice Department says Live Nation also threatened to retaliate against one firm if it didn’t stop a subsidiary from competing for artist promotion contracts.

    But competitor ticket sellers have long complained that Live Nation makes it difficult for them to disrupt the market with practices such as withholding acts if those venues don’t agree to use Ticketmaster’s service.

    The lawsuit is the latest example of the Biden administration’s aggressive antitrust enforcement approach targeting companies accused of engaging in illegal monopolies that box out competitors and drive up prices.

    In March, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Apple alleging that the tech giant has monopoly power in the smartphone market.

    “Today’s action is a step forward in making this era of live music more accessible for the fans, the artists, and the industry that supports them,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said in a statement.


    The original article contains 635 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    They didn’t donate enough this election year. This is a warning to all other corpos to pay up.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Or, you know, a good thing happened.

      God damn. You people can’t be happy about anything ever, for any reason.