misk@sopuli.xyz to Europe@feddit.deEnglish · 6 months agoRolls-Royce gets Poland's backing to build its nuclear power plantswww.euronews.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down14
arrow-up197arrow-down1external-linkRolls-Royce gets Poland's backing to build its nuclear power plantswww.euronews.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Europe@feddit.deEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squaresolo@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·edit-26 months agoCO2 is not an existential threat, corporations and financial entities are because what we call polution, they call it life.
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·6 months agoYes CO2 is the existential threat. Even in socialist countries CO2 is produced. Economic systems and forms of production do not make energy sources clean. Socialist and capitalist countries both ought to and must fight against CO2 production.
minus-squaresolo@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·6 months agoSocialist countries? Of course definitions vary, so which ones are you referring to?
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 months agoWhatever ones exist now or have ever existed as defined by you.
minus-squaresolo@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·6 months agoYour answer is a conversation stopper and I will respect that.
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-26 months agoI respect your position. But for clarity, the reason I offered you such a choice is to offer you the best opportunity to present a strong case.
CO2 is not an existential threat, corporations and financial entities are because what we call polution, they call it life.
Yes CO2 is the existential threat. Even in socialist countries CO2 is produced.
Economic systems and forms of production do not make energy sources clean. Socialist and capitalist countries both ought to and must fight against CO2 production.
Socialist countries? Of course definitions vary, so which ones are you referring to?
Whatever ones exist now or have ever existed as defined by you.
Your answer is a conversation stopper and I will respect that.
I respect your position. But for clarity, the reason I offered you such a choice is to offer you the best opportunity to present a strong case.