• jkrtn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hm, read a dissertation from a Uighur genocide fan who communicates in childish video game cartoons, or focus on people who aren’t delusional? Tough choice for me but I’ll have to go with the latter.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well, no one can say I didn’t try. If that’s the kind of engagement you want,

      ahem

      objection

      phoenix-objection-1phoenix-objection-2 In a court of law, evidence is the only thing that matters! Your baseless accusations are… completely meaningless!

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        What a goofy little clown. You have no substantial thoughts and have to do this instead.

        Thanks for the laughs and nostalgia. Loved that game.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You have no substantial thoughts

          objection

          There is a contradiction in this testimony! You literally just called my previous comment a “dissertation” and refused to read it! So it’s impossible for you to know if my thoughts are substantive or not!

          The defense would like to submit a piece of evidence: this tweet!

          This doesn’t actually prove anything, I just think it’s funny!