• Only 57 fossil fuels and cement producers have been responsible for most of the world’s CO2 emissions since 2016, according to the Carbon Majors report by InfluenceMap
  • Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, and Coal India were the top three CO2-emitting companies during this period.
  • InfluenceMap’s database aims to increase transparency around climate change contributors for legal, academic, campaign, and investor purposes.

Archive.org

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    This just in: few companies supply energy to our planet.

    This shouldn’t surprise anyone. These are massive conglomerates that will keep pumping as long as the demand exists

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      These are massive conglomerates that will keep demand high by attacking alternative energy sources, funding climate denial, and engaging in sanctioned corruption.

      • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        And (artificially) lowering fossil fuel prices, if we tax the shit out of oil companies, people will start looking for alternatives.

    • hannes3120@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah - those headlines do more harm than good as people will just point fingers and think it’s enough to shut those companies down in order to fix climate change…

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        subsidy and investment on green energy are great ideas to cut the cycle. they could be doing that.

        instead we subsidy and invest in fossil fuels instead…

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        How would there ever be less demand if these same companies sabotage any alternative?