Any Chromium and Firefox browser prior to version 116 will be vulnerable to this, update your browsers.

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nah, this bullshit is progress.
    The root of this problem has always existed. Exploits have always been there, mistakes have always been there. These things are fundamentally unavoidable.
    Acknowledging then, documenting them is new. Sensible disclosure is new. Companies paying for these bug bounties before they are publicly disclosed (so they can be fixed) is new.
    And it’s awesome. It’s security. It’s people working together for the betterment of everyone.

    It would be amazing if people didn’t make mistakes. But that isn’t possible.
    Openess, honesty and quickly remedying of issues is possible, and it’s laudable.

    So yeh, next time you get an annoying update that interrupts you’re workflow. Please understand the work and reason behind the update. You can still be pissed at the interruption, but please appreciate the human reason for it.

    Edit: I read “good” as “god”. Idk if that changes anything

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I def agree with the openess tenor of your reply. People and companies (since companies technically “are” people) need to stop valuing pride over security and safety and all the good stuff of life. Like, just fix the damn cancer, stop trying to hide it and cut off the progrssively more necrotic limbs to save face.

      We don’t disagree on anything, I was perhaps inelegant and non-specific in my invective.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        since companies technically “are” people

        This wording is some legal loophole bullshit.
        I have tried to word something that disagrees with this for 30m. I can’t figure it out.
        This is bullshit.
        But this “company is person” tries to re-humanise corporations. I think. Or something.

        Have some ranting…

        A company is a group of people working in the interest of themselves.
        A person is generally working in the interest of themselves.
        A group of people always has more power than a single person, and thus should be held to a higher standard.

        It seems like Google is taking this seriously… now (assigning a 10.0. The next highest is an 8.8 for $15k). But it seems like the cve is still assigned to chrome, as opposed to libwebp (where the actual vulnerability is)

        And while I appreciate the publication - the fact its a 0-day publication (as opposed to “we patched this 6 months ago”) means Google hasn’t taken it seriously previously (or it’s be found exploited in the wild)

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Dude, put down the keyboard lol. We basically agree on everything but…I dunno, theze takes of yours. I’m not siding with corporations, I’m making a snide reference that interrogates the RealPolitik of modern life and insists that corporations (which are a legal fictional person(a) akin to a psychopathic pen-name persona of an author in some sense) act at least or far more responsible than a regular person. To those who are given and recieve much, much should be expected in my view.

          These discussions and discourse go a lot better and profit us substantially moreso if you really read the words and start from the vantage point of assuming good-faith. Had another guy the other day blow up since I made a competely unrelated oblique joke/reference and it was completely outta line. He was nice enough about it after he acknowledged the language barrier but I sense thats not an issue here so play nicely.

          I’m on your side, don’t friendly-fire your compatriots.