Nemeski@lemm.ee to Apple@lemmy.zip · 4 months agoApple’s collapse proves cosying up to Trump is no guarantee of safetywww.telegraph.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: deapple@lemm.ee
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkApple’s collapse proves cosying up to Trump is no guarantee of safetywww.telegraph.co.ukNemeski@lemm.ee to Apple@lemmy.zip · 4 months agomessage-square15linkfedilinkcross-posted to: deapple@lemm.ee
minus-squareArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-24 months agoWhat could have protected Apple other than a reasonable trade policy or a specific exemption? I don’t think Trump would have done either for anyone.
minus-squaremonkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoUnless they swear fealty and pay him
minus-squareArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-24 months agoNo, I don’t think that would have worked. Many did and it didn’t work. These tariffs are Trump’s pet project - he’s not going to compromise on them easily.
What could have protected Apple other than a reasonable trade policy or a specific exemption? I don’t think Trump would have done either for anyone.
Unless they swear fealty and pay him
No, I don’t think that would have worked. Many did and it didn’t work. These tariffs are Trump’s pet project - he’s not going to compromise on them easily.