• go_go_gadget@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Presumptuous gesture there, personally I supported Sanders in both 2016 and 2020 primaries, but failing that I’ll take who has a chance to stop a greater threat over making some protest gesture by writing in someone who has no chance given the realities of the established system.

    Along with fighting, downplaying, undermining, and trivializing anyone who sees things differently.

    There are plenty of moderate and liberal voters finger wagging us to support their pro-corporate trash candidate. We don’t need you joining their ranks. What we need is for you to tell them they either need to make material compromises with us or lose to MAGA.

    • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      See, I won’t do that because these sort of ultimatums are counter productive to the larger goal. If liberal ideals are the end target then saying ‘give it now or let MAGA take over for all I care’ ends up putting everything that HAS been gained at risk to make a point. Letting the far right take control will inevitably move everyone and everything further away from the end goals making it that much more unlikely to make up that lost ground and make any progress in future administrations.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        See, I won’t do that because these sort of ultimatums are counter productive to the larger goal.

        You’re blindly accepting ultimatums handed to us daily by moderate and liberals and then calling it out when we fight back. You’re trying to hold us to a different standard than liberal and moderate voters.

        putting everything that HAS been gained at risk

        Again, this is a two way street. If moderates and liberals aren’t willing to make material compromises with us they are also putting “everything that has been gained at risk”.

        • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          What I accept is math, nothing more or less.

          Take a basic presumption that things are near a 50/50 split but on the optimistic premise that Biden ends up with say 53% of the vote leaving 47%✓to Trump. Now this ‘movement’ comes along and convinces maybe 10% of those people to go some other direction because ‘Biden bad’ regardless of the issues with Trump.

          You now get a 43/47/10 split, which given the nature of the electoral college actually ends up with a Trump landslide claiming the electors in multiple contested state.

          Unless you are willing to say that Biden is at least as bad as or worse than Trump (in which case you may as well vote for Trump), or are convinced that you can get a near unanimous vote to go outside the nominated candidate for the Democrat party, then all your efforts does is support a Trump victory. Your personal morals being placated won’t do a thing to save Palestine, preserve rights for vulnerable populations, or anything else of consequence.

          What this ends up as is essentially the ‘Bernie broes’ from 2016 who refused to support Clinton and helped get Trump a first term.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You just sailed over everything I called you out on: You are holding progressives and leftists to a different standard than moderates and liberals.

            • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, I’m simply reiterating the realities of today. The electoral college in all but 2 states as I last recalled awards all the state’s electors to whomever wins the simple majority in a state. If things where exactly 50/50 today and these protesting groups siphoned away votes specifically from Biden then you now hand Trump the state. It works the other way too.

              Now if somehow these people siphoned an equal amount from both parties it becomes a wash and irrelevant, but since it’s a specifically anti-Biden effort that’s not likely the case.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                No, I’m simply reiterating the realities of today

                Yes, but you’re only telling this to progressives and leftists despite having near zero input on policy while giving moderates and liberals a free pass while they enjoy full control of all policy decisions.

                • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I would tell the same to anyone who cares to not see a second Trump term regardless of ideology. I’m no more fond of the modern D party than anyone, but it beats the alternative.

                  • go_go_gadget@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    I would tell the same to anyone who cares to not see a second Trump term regardless of ideology.

                    No you’re not. That’s the point. You aren’t lecturing moderates and liberals for refusing to make material compromises with leftists and progressives. You know as well as I do the only reason they’re voting for Biden is because he’s catered to them. Again, you are holding leftists and progressives to a different standard.