Absolutely, thanks! I got this (crucial?) detail missed, that the two aren’t independent but AI overviews cannibalizing traditional ads both losing money.

Add a verified badge on your regurgitated content farm bot account for just $5.99 a month.

They are making less off of AI overviews than traditional ads, but their AI buildout costs are increasing, which is ass backwards. I don’t know if it was in their report but they also supposedly don’t have a strategy for making their customers pay for AI use.

They revealed that they make less money on the AI Overview than traditional ads. Also they, supposedly, have no strategy to monetize AI use from their customers.

Genuinely asking: if I buy a game (aka “license to play”) on steam, is it morally ok to acquire the same on the high seas? I assume The devs got paid when I paid steam?

Halo VI IIIIII

Who understands Roman numbering anyways

Yep, fair point.

… don’t see that happening in any IT, science, medical, or engineering field…

While this is most definitely a common sense take, in reality “maximize shareholder value” will push companies no choice but to automate these jobs for worse results.

Yeah, I was thinking the same. Once he starts losing money & fans, how’s he (or his PR team) going to spin his apology?

My money is on: “I made a mistake, I’m listening, I’m learning, I’m donating” schtick. IMO There’s a point after which you can’t claim you just didn’t know & ask for an apology. You’ve shown you hand & there’s no going back.

What a terrible headline! It isn’t misleading for clickbait, it’s just… inconsequential. The headline belies the main point of Broche’s thinking:

Rather than pleasing an imaginary audience, Broche reveals that development on Clair Obscur was focused on satisfying the developers.

"Lost me young lady, no more listening to you,” one former fan wrote to Musgraves on X.

Uh oh, what will she do now?

She has spent her career backing progressive causes, from supporting immigrants to gun control and LGBTQ+ rights.

Nah she’ll be fine