• 15 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 2 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2026年4月6日

help-circle










  • It seems you have misunderstood the premise a bit. So I’ll explain.

    1. It is not “better” than Wikipedia in the sense that it is competing. In fact it will work alongside Wikipedia. If Wikipedia is a heap of all information loosely linked with each other, the Skill Graph is the key to navigate the heap. It’s the section of library that tells you how the library is itself arranged.

    2. You will use those free resources itself when you use the Skill Graph. We will NOT make documents. The internet already contains adeqaute sources, we simply chain them together in a way that makes learning make sense as it does in a curriculum. The trick is to do it in such a way as to not kill pluralism, hence the modular “Graph” format.

    3. We will not write documents, but if you mean who validates the source linking - no one. There will be many many sources linked for a topic and you will be able to filter it by popularity, type, media format, author etc. By making comparisons between sources easy, learners will be able to judge the best while choosing what suits them best.

    Finally, this is NOT perfect, We simply believe that it is a good start by utilising the vast swathes of educational content on the internet. And a lot of other ideas are being brainstormed right now. To know our progress or to contribute your ideas as well, reach out and keep in touch.








  • It was not written by any LLM. I do use Claude to write some lengthy material because it transforms my incoherent rants into structured documents which are easier to communicate with other people. However this was purely me. Not even a draft. I wrote this straight on my phone. I made the community to be professional and not too personal, maybe that’s what gives the vibe. Thanks for reading anyways and we do not really care about AI usage, as long as the job is done well.