I’m just here for the moral superiority.🌱
Mainly interested in FOSS
Currently in uni and working part-time as a developer and system administrator.

PC Specs
CPU: 7800X3D
GPU: 7900XTX
Memory: 64GB
System: Arch

  • 9 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 15th, 2026

help-circle

  • TheCornCollector@piefed.ziptoVegan@slrpnk.netMan boobs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m not defending the meme at all. I agreed with the point immediately in the first sentence. I just interpreted the tone of some remarks to be a bit condescending and gave a recommendation based on my opinion on that. Do with it what you want. I’m not here to force any view onto you.


  • TheCornCollector@piefed.ziptoVegan@slrpnk.netMan boobs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I agree with your first point and I really dislike the amount of misinformation flowing around on both sides, but spending even a little time online will show that is just humans being humans on any topic.

    Since any other reference probably wouldn’t work here, have one from one of those holistic medicine places

    I’m not sure if I’m reading it right, but are you saying that people here, so vegans, don’t trust normal scientific evidence and are only here to reinforce their beliefs by excluding proper evidence? That sounds kind of patronising and implies people are only vegan because of their biased world view instead of proper ethics and science.

    […] to promote a hobby.

    This also sounds dismissive of veganism and rude towards people that try their best to reduce harm in a part of their life. Vegans do it because they see it as necessary to live ethically consistent. This is not something done for ✨fun✨.

    I would recommend leaving these unnecessary remarks out of your comments if you want to address misinformation such as in this post more effectively while also coming off more respectful.





  • I’m really not fond of the profiling by automated means, but it seems like an inevitable consequence of the design of the threadiverse. Everything is public and easily accessible by anyone that would like to profile you.

    I certainly disapprove of moderation based on ideology. Moderation should be based on quality of the content and if it fits in the publicly readable rules. Definitely not some hidden analytics or if the user completely fits in the in-group of the moderator.

    I will admit that this might be a good way to find and filter out LLM based bots that are only there to promote or manipulate the conversation. But it should still be done according to public rules.











  • I’ve been using it for the past few days and the output quality seems to be on par or slightly better than 3.5 27b. The biggest issue is the token usage that has exploded with this revision. It can easily reason for 20k-25k tokens on a question where the qwen3.5 models used 10k. Since it runs more than 3 times faster, it still finished earlier than the 27b, but I won’t have any context/vram left to ask multiple questions.

    Artificial Analysis has similar findings. Bar graph of output tokens for different models. Qwen3.6 35b: 140 million, Qwen3.5 35b: 100 million