• Supervivens@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “With Apple Care — which costs $500 for the Vision Pro — there’s a $299 deductible for damaging the cover glass. Without it, it’ll cost $799.” Lmao what? So it’s exactly the same unless you somehow manage to break it twice within the same period? That’s dumb as shit lol

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Manufacturing defects would be covered by the hardware warranty. Apple care wouldn’t come into play at all.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Any time a product has multiple failure in a point like this, in this case a narrow part of a glass structure, it is a design defect. These are all in exactly the same place, right in the middle above the nose.

    It should be obvious that the location of the crack is where the glass could bend when the sides are pulled in to fit the person’s face when the straps holding in on are tightened. Clearly they allow that area to flex too much for the materials used to hold up.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, it’s definitely user error. Apple clearly states in the manual, that you’re not supposed to use the goggles like goggles!

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not a design defect a mfg defect. Glass doesn’t split perfectly like that if it’s a design issue imo.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        While it is possible that manufacturing could contribute, if the quality control is done and the tolerances are withing the design specs and it fails then it is a design issue. A better design would handle a significant amount of extra stress in this part of the goggles.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s some speculation that this may be a heating issue when charging the Vision Pro in the case or with the cover on. Others contend it might be a manufacturing problem with the glass or simply a design flaw that puts too much tension on that particular area.

    That’s all the same problem.

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I haven’t faceplanted, but I have punched myself in the headset repeatedly. Turns out looking at things up close is not advisable when your face happens to have an invisible box strapped to it.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This headset is mainly used with pass through so you can see stuff. But it still can happen if you have a digital screen covering your view

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Kind of ironic, that they’ve learned nothing from the exact same issue that practically half of iPhone 3g/3gs owners had

  • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Unclear? They’re putting it on [aka: holding it] wrong. User error.

    Lets hope, for Apple’s sake, that this isn’t a Q2 Elite Strap debacle.