• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    10 months ago

    You block ads because of privacy.

    I block ads to cause the greatest amount of financial damage, purely out of spite.

    We are not the same.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah that’s my whole thing with ads, I understand monetization is necessary but it’s gotten so far out of fucking hand

        • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          I agree. Small, non-intrusive banner ads with an easy close button are fine. They get the message across without getting in anyone’s way.

          The problem is the ads that stop you from doing anything for the best part of a minute. I don’t see how anyone has ever been convinced to buy whatever product is being advertised by these, but somehow, they’re the ones that are everywhere.

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I don’t know why some people sugar coat it.

    I’d pirate anyway because I don’t wanna spend money, and so would a lot of people who instead choose to hide behind excuses.

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have seen these big long winded speeches about how immoral it is to sell copyrighted material and how some dumb shit like spiderman should fall under the ‘free sharing of ideas to better humanity’ and blah blah blah.

      Bro. We are thieves. We are stealing because its easy and the products cost too much.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It also depends on who’s behind the product. Good indie game with one or a few developers - never. Adobe - I consider it a moral obligation.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      In what world is getting something for free that the original owners are charging money for not theft?

      You engaged in a TOS with a service provider. The terms of your ownership were not negotiated and yet you tacitly agreed to the contract.

      • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The one we live in, where software is being sold to consumers with terms of service that say customers don’t own the software they bought.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Right. You license it. Owning something isn’t the be all end all of commerce. Just admit you like getting free stuff.

          Do you complain about the Theme Park getting to keep all of its rides when you leave at the end of the day? You paid money to be there, surely you should get to take part of the park home with you.

          • nailoC5@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            10 months ago

            A better comparation would be this: you paid for Dondurma and after the guy is done with the tricks he moved on to the other customer so you asked where’s my ice cream. And he says umm actually if you scanned the QR code of the menu you would have known, after watching 2 ads, that you are paying for the tricks not the ice cream

          • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            As someone who has literally never bought any software at all, ever… I just get the stuff I need whether it is free or not. I don’t care if it is freeware or not actually

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        The key part of theft is taking the object away from the original owner, which doesnt happen with Piracy, its more akin to forgery than it is theft

  • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I used to NOT advocate for piracy. I still pirated shit because I did not want to pay but I never suggested that it was the right thing to do. But the way that these corporations try to fuck their customers more and more I feel like paying for something is basically tipping a billionaire. Their pockets are bottomless and they will figure out a hundred different ways to make sure they don’t pay taxes on those billions while the rest of us have to pay a third of our hard earned cash in taxes. Piracy is not only OK, I think it is warranted at this point.

      • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        And billionaires are not entitled to fucking tax breaks every year. I’ll start paying when they start paying their fair share.

        Also I literally said that in my comment. But you were too busy sucking off a billionaire.

        • Urethra Franklin@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t worry, I’ve been following his simple minded, tone deaf train of thought for several posts.

          He’s too busy posting to respond (rather than replying to discuss) to remember to cup the balls.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Copyright infringement”: when a shitty set of laws, known collectively as copyright laws, infringe not just on people individual rights but also on the advancing and progressing of society.

      300% real definition

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just enjoy having 1 app to browse the content I want to watch instead of a dozen different apps that suck in their own special ways.

    • The Overlord@tsck.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      plex won’t download properly on my phone, but it’s not because some big company decided that I’m not allowed to do that, it’s just cause the devs suck.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    If those corporations are allowed to do it, then so are we.

    Even the corporation that made all those “You wouldn’t download a car” ads are now downloading actors for their movies.

  • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The crazy thing is that you’ve been tricked into thinking piracy even is theft

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      When subtraction is equivalent to addition because capitalists needs to justify owning the means of production.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Copyright infringement isn’t a crime though, only commercial copyright infringement is.

  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    obligatory “if buying isn’t owning, then pirating isn’t stealing”

    and also there’s a moral argument for data preservation here somewhere