“Banks call it a service,” the president said. “I call it exploitation.”

The Biden administration unveiled a new rule Wednesday aimed at slashing bank overdraft fees to as low as $3, a move the president said would help end abusive practices by financial institutions.

Under the proposal, banks could continue to charge fees when a customer’s account falls below zero, but either at a price in line with the bank’s actual costs to administer the overdraft or at an established benchmark created by the new rule.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed potential fees of $3, $6, $7 or $14 and is seeking feedback from banks and the public on what would be appropriate. Current overdraft fees often push $30 or more, taking a significant bite out of low-income accounts.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s unfair that a bank can make 3 dollars off me for not having 3 dollars to pay. I have to have thousands of dollars in the bank to make 3 dollars. So I think the overdraft should be the exact amount over drafted plus the interest per the amount overdrafted. That’s fair.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s not fair because of the risk of total loss. You giving money to the bank earning interest, there’s no risk the bank is just going to stop responding to you and keep your money. There’s a chance someone who owes the bank money is just gonna stop going to that bank and they’ll have to write off the full amount as a loss.

      But, I believe this is essentially what they do in Canada. It’s two different rates, because a negative balance is essentially taking out a non-collateralized loan. But you don’t have to ask extra permission on small amounts, you just owe the interest.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    do away with "account maintenance fees"for not having a big enough balance too

    (also things like these are why i don’t take the people who say biden is a conservative or he doesn’t do anything seriously)

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Isn’t it already the case that you can just set it so overdrafts won’t work and if you try to spend money you don’t have it just rejects? I’d rather have the rule be that by default with an opt-in for overdrafts that cost money.

    Just seems weird to set hard dollar numbers in a rule, they’re going to get outdated and not worth it to the banks so they’ll just turn it off themselves, I’d rather have the option.

  • 🅿🅸🆇🅴🅻@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I have no issue with overdraft fees, which are normal (for credit accounts), but my problem is that to my understanding most cards in the US are credit cards (so overdraft-capable) by default. Rest of the world takes advantage of the more sane debit card.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You either have a very different debit card system than the US, or a very different definition of the word sane. I assure you that in the US, debit cards are (generally) not the better option.

      In fact, I can confirm it - you have it completely wrong. It is only debit cards that can have an overdraft. Credit cards are when you have an ongoing, semi-permanent line of credit available to you. Let’s say this limit is $1,000. Each time you use it, the credit card issuer pays the merchant. If you attempt a purchase beyond that line of credit, you may (and often are) denied the purchase. If it does go through, you will have to pay an over-limit fee. The credit issuer then sends an itemized invoice, typically at the same time each month, and you must repay them. If you don’t repay them in full by the deadline, you must pay interest. The main takeaway is that credit cards are always someone else’s money at the time of purchase.

      Debit cards are typically linked to your personal checking account. They work differently on the backend, but are usually similar at the point of sale. Checks, which link to the same account on the backend, often bypass validation of funds. Your bank processes the transaction on your behalf, but (again, typically) has not granted you any line of credit. If you get a transaction through where you don’t have the funds, the bank is then forced by their agreements with the payment processor to extend you a line of credit. But the main takeaway is that debit cards are your own money, in your account, at the time of purchase.

      It’s a common (but dangerous) trick when you’re low on funds to use credit cards to “float” an expense. Debit means you must have the funds presently available in your account, which often means they must have been deposited a few days ago. Credit means you have until your next statement to arrange them, which likely includes at least 1 payday.

    • Duranie@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “to my understanding most cards in the US are credit cards”

      This statement confuses me a bit, but I guess that adds to the misunderstanding? Debit and credit cards are tied to different types of accounts. Which you’re using depends on if you have the money and want it immediately removed from your checking account, or if you want to “borrow” and pay the total once a month.

      When I helped my sons open their first checking accounts and got their debit cards, we had to “opt in” to not allow overdrafts and to have purchases cancelled, but that option would expire once they hit a certain age and would have to select it again. The backup to that is if you have a savings account, the accounts can be linked so that if you were to overdraft, the extra would be taken from savings to prevent overdraft fees.

      These are all great things, assuming you have money in the first place. If you believe Americans are using credit cards more often than debit, it’s probably 1) because CC companies incentivize us to do so, or 2) people just generally don’t have the money to meet their needs in the first place, so juggle and borrow funds as they try to keep their heads above water.

      • 🅿🅸🆇🅴🅻@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        1. because CC companies incentivize us to do so

        That was my point, yes. Also, see my other comment, I live in Europe where credit lines (we do have the so-called “shopping” cards offering fixed installments for purchases but also overdraft at an ATM) aren’t the norm here and people opening up such an account take it more seriously and pay attention not to overdraft. Confusing terms and scum agents promoting those cards do trick people into overdrafting and paying huge monthly interests (30% / year) instead of fixed installments, though.

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Actual poor people can’t get credit cards, then a few dollars of overdraft puts them deep in the negative. Guess how many hours a minimum wage earning american has to work to overcome a SINGLE overdraft fee…