- cross-posted to:
- brainworms@lemm.ee
- usa@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- brainworms@lemm.ee
- usa@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Just in case nobody noticed: Epstein didn’t kill himself.
We know.
so i figure nothing earth shattering in here if we didn’t get 20 headlines about it?
no. it’s either being written up carefully or suppressed. I’m at page 134, and oooo boy it’s juicy.
edit 326-343 are completely redacted.
edit 2: I’ll have to dig through later. a lot of pages are corrections to testimony. Notably though, is a few sections on Prince Andrew. He was clearly involved and at least present at the time.
edit 326-343 are completely redacted.
Probably implicates politicians and/or their owner donors. Can’t have the peasants know the atrocities of their lords.
edit 326-343 are completely redacted.
These might be the most interesting pages
Apparently, the absence of something salacious is proof of something salacious.
Anyone else have a bit of smoldering rage that everyone knows what went on, and so far no one but Ghislane Maxwell, Epstein himself and one prince have had even an ounce of trouble from it?
Kinda how Trump will die of old age one day still living a 1% lifestyle and having never seen the inside of a prison.
when you have an extortionate advantage over someone, you’re dangerous - it’s much the same policy as a nuclear deterrent.
The trump lawyers, the judge, the jury and everyone at the trials…uhoo…and then what else did you do? Did you guys steal the money from those people too? Hmm, what about the pee pee tapes? Did you guys really do that for reals? How fun and interesting…funteresting!
Day 300 of the trial…so you touched her private privately? And did she jump? Or just sort of moan a little? Oh tell us more! So you really think she liked it? Ma’am! Hold on, you’ll get your chance too, right now it’s "the president’s turn…so did you go for the boobies first? And how? We didn’t bring a dummy, could you show us on her where you touched? It’s for the public records ma’am… c’mon, you want a fair trial yes? Well this is pretty fair? How to we know if he really touched our there or not? Anyway, it’s done, let’s just take our seats…
wat.
Lots of tight lips in this document 🤐
If I were a powerful douchebag, would I allow the release of one of the many documents that says that I did stuff… or the one we made earlier specifically to exonerates me that says that we did not?
Are you a powerful douchebag?
Powerful? No :-P.
Oh my… I was not expecting that
Oh man, Your Favorite Martian. Takes me back.
He has some newer stuff, rebooting that project apparently. I haven’t listened to it yet b/c I was going through the older stuff first to remind me of it, which is how I found this one:-P.
There was some kind of delay in the release, to allow people who didn’t want their names to show up to request they get redacted. So expect anyone that’s still named to be able to spin the narrative.
There’s a handful of names from sexually abused women that remain redacted, and only 2 names that have additional time to justify why they should stay redacted. Source
The judge said a handful of names should remain blacked out in the documents because they would identify people who were sexually abused.
Two people whose name appears in the records have been given additional time to make arguments to the court as to why their names should stay redacted.
Glad they are being revealed. Great to see.
Is that like a version number? Is 1.3.25 coming soon?
It’s yesterday’s date with periods instead of forward slashes.
deleted by creator
Lol
