Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

    • derphurr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Doesn’t matter, over half won’t be voting. Even less than normal if GOP state legislatures do away with mail in ballots or automatic mailed request forms from COVID times.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The less people who vote the more elections Republicans win.

        Make sure your friends go vote (unless they’re trumpeter assholes maybe, then don’t talk about it).

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Less young people voting is a direct result of the national DNC’s deeply infuriating tactic of promising a fuckton of stuff and then just abandoning those goals and… “compromising” with the GOP every single fucking time the chips are down. And here, “compromise” is pronounced “submit to”, because most Democrats have the neurological inability to understand that these days the GOP will betray them simply on principle, or because one GOP rep wants to tweet something so they can “troll the libs”. And then we all suffer for it.

          We all fucking understand the stakes here. The DNC is actively pushing young voters away by using such a deeply cynical strategy and then thinking we’ll forget all about that stupidity the next time an election comes around. From where a lot of young people are standing, it looks a lot like a choice between “actively bad” and “passively bad”, and it’s hard to give a fuck about that, especially if you’re already struggling with other shit in your life, like most of our generation is to one degree or another.

          Don’t get me wrong - I vote in every single election I can. But the amount of deeply, fundamentally uninspiring or even actively bad candidates I feel I’m forced to vote for, simply because they’re not a neo-Nazi or a member of the GOP is not small. And to all you vOTe fOr a ThiRD pArTY types out there: you and I both know that’s a great way to hand elections to the GOP, given how our shitty electoral system works.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The party is absolutely taking advantage of how bad their opponents have become. Democratic party leadership has regarded the left of the party with such withering contempt for so long, and then they wonder why the left resents them.

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s super frustrating, because while I still think it’s possible to move the DNC in a more reliably progressive direction, it’s abundantly clear all the fossils in charge of the party have no intention whatsoever of going in that direction, so we either need to force them out or wait for them to die.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder when this magical time was where voting for the president had great choices. What many young voters fail to understand is that it’s not all about the president. Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation, and if you send that to your far-from-ideal president’s desk, they’ll sign it.

      It’s certainly a much easier task than having an awesome progressive president who begs a near 50-50 Congress to pass good bills, and it just doesn’t happen.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation,

        We had 60 and they killed the public option. How many do we need?

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.

        The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ok, so we need to force the system to change outside of its normal paths of power to have choices. No one thinks this time existed, everyone understands the current situation is bad.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.

          The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.

          repeated comment

          • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well I’ve seen them very a clear majority and not do anything, so this feels like a situation where the pertinent number will always been “just a bit more”.

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Please tell me you’re not talking about the two month window in 2010 where they had a filibuster-proof majority, and passed a major healthcare reform bill, but it was kneecapped because it relied on Joe Lieberman to pass. Because that’s a case where a couple more Democrats would have made a huge difference in what we would have gotten, and also turned 2 months and some change into two years.

              • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                See, this is exactly what I’m talking about; no matter how many they get, it always wasn’t quite enough. It always needed “just a couple more”.

                • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Having enough is a spectrum: the more there are, the bolder the legislation and the more likely it is to pass. So however many you get, you always fall short of doing even better with more.

                  Single payer healthcare had been discussed in the early stages — and it was clear they wouldn’t have 60 votes for it, so it was a non-starter. Because there were exactly 60 D/Is, there was no wiggle room. And the GOP held up the 60th Senator in the courts as long as they could because they had no wiggle room. And then Ted Kennedy had to vote for the ACA on his virtual deathbed, and after that their 60 votes were gone, so they couldn’t spend more time on healthcare or move on to other tough issues. Lieberman forced them to remove the public option from the bill.

                  But you are just overlooking that they did pass a major, consequential healthcare reform bill that solved some very important problems, which couldn’t be accomplished for decades before then, even though people tried.

                  And this all touches on my original point: a couple more Senators would have changed things significantly at that time, but a more progressive president would not have.

    • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right? This poll is literally the same as asking young voters if they would rather have their entire heads cut off or just their eyes and ears gouged out.

      • Xhieron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        What on earth are you talking about? Joe Biden tried to give 20k to each of them who went to college. And he would have if the–let me check my notes here: oh, right–Nazis in the other party hadn’t sued to prevent him from giving away money.

        I appreciate that Biden might not be some folks’ first choice, but if you think young people believe another four years of Grampa Joe is just barely more tolerable than the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist traitors, you might need to meet one.

        • Nudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          It doesn’t really matter in the long run, America is run by oil companies, not the people. Joe signed off on more land for drilling than trump did.

          • SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I believe those were agreements signed by Trump that Biden had to follow through on, no?

            But let’s also be clear, Biden appointed the first Native Secretary of the Interior and signed the Inflation Reduction Act (the most significant climate legislation the US has ever had). Trump appointed Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          9 months ago

          Brother he’s basically a war criminal the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist dictators is already happening

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        He seems to be doing a pretty good job given his poor circumstances where the Republican house and supreme court are both totally useless.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          He didn’t have those issues in his first two years. His own party blocked his agenda.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Wel the first two years we had the fuckheads Sinema and Manchin who are basically republicans at this point

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe pay attention to what’s actually happening rather than just repeating what other people say about him.

        Biden is continuing to seek (and find) pathways to forgiving student loan debt, despite the Supreme Court ruling against his program. Millions of people have had their loans forgiven since that decision, and it seems more are getting it every day.

        Anyone who thinks he’s senile or incoherent should listen to the interview he did on Conan O’Brien’s podcast that was released the other day. I was surprised that it went so well, and Biden was far more lucid than I’ve ever seen Trump.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think he’s senile, I just think he’s out of touch. It’s hard to be in touch as an 80-some year old man.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        9 months ago

        This…just absolutely this. I was going to post something along the lines of it being a choice between eating shit or being flayed alive, but this is just better. Kudos.

  • It's Maddie!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Young voters overwhelmingly prefer the guy who’s not actively trying to destroy the future, how shocking!

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Biden is absolutely trying to destroy the future, just much, much slower than the Republicans.

    • EasternLettuce@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      Biden is literally trying to destroy the future. He has personally approved many new fossil fuel extraction sites including a pipeline that climate scientists have dubbed a climate time bomb

      • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Trumps stated first step is to “drill drill drill” so please explain why this isn’t an effort to dissuade from the better option?

        • EasternLettuce@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Did I mention trump anywhere in my comment? Your argument is a straw man. The OP said that Biden was not trying to destroy the world. I informed him that Biden is trying to destroy the world, simple as that.

          • joenforcer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Biden isn’t trying to destroy the world. Everything isn’t black and white no matter how much you want it to be. We’re back in the Paris Climate Accords despite how the man-baby in the previous administration pulled out because Obama.

            I mean, if you want to argue that we are going to destroy the world no matter what, we could speedrun it by electing the fascist who wants to destabilize the entire world by pulling out of NATO. I however would prefer to live out the remainder of my natural life instead of nuclear Armageddon deciding for me.

    • qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been saying this for years. It’s kind of not really a choice, as much as it sucks. Let’s just hope enough people actually turn out to vote

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah people catastrophise so badly when it comes to politics. Biden is bland, uninspired and gaff-prone - however, he is a safe pair of hands. Just because a politician does not make you excited does not mean they suck.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      You guys aren’t going to convince anyone to vote with the lesser of evils spiel. Shit’s gonna get bad and all you had to do was pick a real candidate.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You guys aren’t going to convince anyone to vote with the lesser of evils spiel

        What do you think happened in 2020?

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Biden made a bunch of promises and acted like progressives and leftists actually had a seat at the table. The BBB, student loan, weed legalization, rail strike and gaza genocide have made it clear: We do not.

          We gave him a chance and he gave us the finger.

          • TechyDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            You do realize that Biden can’t just declare things into law, right?

            For the first two years, Biden had a Democratic House that could theoretically pass anything he wanted, but a Senate which was split nearly 50-50. If they didn’t get every vote, they could fail to pass a bill. And this doesn’t even get into the filibuster which would tank bills unless 60 votes were reached or the fact that Manchin and Sinema frequently acted to sink Democratic bills despite technically being Democrats. Biden could put some pressure on them, but his options were limited. It’s not like he could hold a gun to their heads and force them to vote on favor of bills

            Since January, Biden has had a Democratic Senate with a razor thin margin and a Republican House. This threw even more wrenches in the works.

            And then there’s the Supreme Court. Thanks to Mitch McConnell, Trump, and the Republicans, the Supreme Court has a huge conservative majority. So Biden can try to take action for things like forgiving student loans, but then Republicans sue, the case ends up in the Supreme Court and the conservative justices rule that Biden isn’t allowed to do this by law. (He’s managed to find a way to forgive some loans even if it wasn’t as much as he wanted to do.)

            Putting all the blame on Biden and saying “he didn’t fulfill all his promises” is disingenuous. He hasn’t exactly had the Congress and Supreme Court that could support what he wanted to do. Could he have done everything anyway and proclaimed that he makes the laws now? Perhaps, but then he’d be a fascist dictator and not working within our political system - exactly the type of thing that Trump wants to do and is properly criticized for.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Buddy, you seem to misunderstand something here. I’m not trying to convince you of anything. If you want to believe Biden deserves your vote go nuts. It makes no difference to me.

              But I’m telling you as someone who voted for him in the 2020 general: Fuck Joe Biden. Do whatever you want with that information. But trust no amount of these excuses will change my mind. I was already angry I had to give him a chance in 2020 after people voted for him in the primaries specifically to fuck over progressive and leftist efforts. I held up my end of the bargain. Biden and the people who elected him in the primaries did not.

              Fuck Joe Biden for screwing up the BBB. Fuck Joe Biden for negotiating down from $50k student loan forgiveness. Fuck Joe Biden for waiting until after the midterms to fuck over the rail workers. Fuck Joe Biden for blocking the strike. Fuck Joe Biden for supporting Israel against our wishes.

              For someone who needs the votes of people like me to win the 2024 general election he sure ain’t fucking acting like it. He can go fuck himself along with everyone who voted for him in the primaries.

              • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ok, so I get that you are privileged enough that you can probably ride out Trumpist fascism without much real damage, at least for a while. Just understand that there are many vulnerable people who will be seriously harmed by your decision to do anything besides voting for Biden. This isn’t dooming or trying to scare you into a vote, it’s a simple statement of fact.

                If you are fine with that moral liability, then carry on.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Funny, that’s precisely how I view the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries. Where’s your ire for them?

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Definitely not trump or Biden. If a decent 3rd party candidate shows I’ll go that route otherwise I’ll just write in.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      The alternative would have been a strong primary challenger, in a just world.

      Im actually quite worried that Trump will be removed from all ballots by the supreme court and Biden will lose to Hailey.

      • joenforcer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think he will get removed from the ballots, at least not in current state. I feel like the argument is going to be the presumption of innocence until proven guilty; an indictment is unfortunately premature. We need to apply the law equally or we’ll get Republicans finding every way to do the same… albeit with no arguments for it.

        I’d rather have Biden lose to Nikki Haley instead of Trump. Yes, I know she’s a legacy Tea Party candidate, I don’t want her, but at least she isn’t campaigning on ethnic cleansing and actually criticized R bullshit like TC&J.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      like biden’s presidency

      him and his vice got in office and immediately went back on campaign promises for cannabis, police reform, women’s rights, voter rights everything went to the shitter just like trump

      now here we are AGAIN

      and people screaming just vote HOW? not everyone has that right thanks to politicians like biden

      https://truthout.org/articles/a-federal-court-will-decide-whether-atlanta-voters-could-have-a-say-on-cop-city/

      cop city is happening under biden’s watch too

      no difference with either demopublican

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Every week it’s a different poll with a different result and a different headline. All I’m learning is that these polls are meaningless.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not all polls are meaningless. But there are a ton of meaningless polls that get an inordinate amount of attention. And I believe the overall goal of that is to make people think they’re all meaningless.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Man, the level of statistics illiteracy here is out of control. I hope y’all are just literal children that are still in pre-algebra or something.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I prefer getting a finger cut off, as opposed to an arm.

    Doesn’t mean I want to lose my finger.

    • cerothem@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Regardless of how you feel about the candidates the important thing is to actually vote. Going around and saying “well they both suck” doesn’t help anyone.

      Not voting then getting the greater of two evils from your perspective is your own fault.

      Always vote, even if the news or anyone else tells you the candidate you want is a sure thing, vote even if the candidate you don’t want seems like a shoe-in.

      • GONADS125@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hillary vs trump was the first election in which I could vote, but I refrained on account of not wanting to vote for a giant douche or a shit sandwich. I will never make that mistake again…

        I’m not a Biden fan, but I voted for him last election and will eagerly do so again this next cycle.

        I also want to point out that the gap between the “lesser of two evils” has turned into the Grand fucking Canyon following trump’s attempts to overthrow our government to remain in power, and platforming on literal fascism…

        It’s a vote for democracy or neonazi fascism. Period.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t know why the Onus is literally never on our politicians to do better. We always have the threat of some worse force to keep us in line.

        • cerothem@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The public selects the representation every few years, the public votes them out that’s a form of being held accountable. If people ignore their right to vote then that can let people abuse their positions or cause people to pander only to people who actually vote since those are the people keeping them in. D

      • n3m37h@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just like Calarado had done there should be a “none of the above” option.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      You aren’t losing a finger, you’re being forced to accept that your politics don’t align with most of your fellow citizens.

      Frederick Douglas couldn’t even vote, but he worked for politicians who couldn’t promise to end slavery.

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wait, just yesterday young voters didn’t like Biden? I’m beginning to think that maybe the news is all made up 🤪

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think that is true. It’s like saying you don’t like a Honda Accord because Ferraris exist. Sure you want everything, but you’ll still appreciate the Accord over the Nike Express.

        • Sabata11792@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Its the difference of sitting in an ugly car VS sticking an industrial wood chipper up my ass and turning it on. Ill take the ugly car.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a fallacy of polling. They only had two choices here. The correct interpretation is they prefer him over Trump, but do not like him.

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t like Biden much either, but a tree stump is just unkind. We needed Bernie Sanders, not another TV celebrity. (I do love me some John though)

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Love John, but he won’t do it. He’s said in multiple interviews that his place is outside the establishment generating the public will to act, which he couldn’t do as a politician. I don’t blame him. He seems to be more effective at getting change done than most senators or even presidents.

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        If Biden were to drop out there’s a long list of people who really don’t have the clout to galvanize a winning coalition on such short notice. The list of people who do and could win is one person long:

        1. John Stewart
        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Stephen Colbert might be on that list too. And honestly, Harris would probably work for the same reasons as Biden.

    • dtrain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not made up. Just a large population.

      I could write an article about how Biden is really a cat and find people on the street to provide quotes for it.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s a difference between voting for him and liking him. He’s an awful person but the alternative is Trump, so there’s not even as choice there

      • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Biden is not an awful person. He is a person who has spent a lifetime in politics and high office and has a long record to pick away at. People tend to forget that politics is the art of the possible. People who never compromise are radicals, like the Tea Party people, for example. It makes no sense to bitch about the radicals on the right and then denigrate the centrist. If you have specific criticisms, fine that’s fair, but just summing Biden up as “an awful person” is both unwarranted and naive about the nature of politics.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You say that like he isn’t using Trump era restrictions on Asylum still and about to restrict the acceptable basis of “reasonable fear” to send more people back to countries where their lives are in danger.

          Or supporting the genocide in Gaza.

          Or getting rail workers killed because he short circuited their strike to save Christmas.

          Or is blaming the current economic crisis on everything but monopolistic/cartel pricing models in necessities like housing and food. While claiming the economy is stronger than ever.

          I could go on. This is all stuff from his presidency. He is an awful person.

          • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            People who don’t understand politics: I want my leader to always act uncompromisingly to solve all of the injustices I see.

            The Tea Party and the Freedumb Caucus: Hold my beer…

            People who don’t understand politics: NoT LiKe Thaaaat!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well it’s hardly surprising.

    It’s like preferring a slice of unbuttered slightly stale bread, to a literal dogshit on a stick, being waved around by others with shit all over their faces, knowing that if they eat enough, you’ll have to eat double.

    • Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I hear ya. So many would literally eat a shit sandwich if it meant a liberal had to smell their breath.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s cool, as long as they actually follow through and vote when the time comes.

    • USAONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Give those polls will start trending towards Biden. The Democrats are ensuring they keep pumping up Trump because they know how terrible he is. Trump is the easiest to beat but you have to wipe the floor with him. He is such a threat that even progressives will put aside their differences and vote Biden.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There is a distinct possibility the Supreme Court prevents Trump from running with this Colorado case in which case Biden is going to get his butt handed to him by Haley.

        This just sucks.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      We got a poll that centrists won’t make up stories about in order to dismiss it in vaguely ageist terms.