• Ignacio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh, do you want my viewing experience to be worse? Well don’t worry, because I’m doing my best so PeerTube has quality content in a weekly basis, while you also have the same content in a monthly basis.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Asking genuinely, if you were in charge of YouTube, and you don’t think anyone should pay for YouTube, and you don’t think you should run ads, how exactly would you go about paying for the massive amount of engineers and infrastructure needed to keep the lights on?

      • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly?

        Not my monkeys, not my circus.

        I don’t care what YouTube wants to do or how they do it, they need viewers and if they can’t figure out how to keep em, ah well. They gotta create a service that caters to my behavior, not the other way around.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, actually, they have to create a service that caters to people who bring them revenue. If that isn’t you, they don’t have to, and actively shouldn’t, cater to you at all.

          You’re just saying “I don’t have an actual answer” in a roundabout way.

          • drkt@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The reason I don’t bring them revenue is because they continue to make the experience worse. Paying isn’t going to make that stop, it’s just going to temporarily shift the bar a little; the bar is however still moving towards a shittier experience for all.

            Why would I look at this and go “Yes, I’ll pay!” There are a lot of services I would genuinely pay for if I didn’t have an impending dread that the service is just about to get worse again regardless of if I pay or not. It’s not like paying is a magic bullet, either, it comes with a ton of different issues like privacy. They still sell your soul to advertisers if you pay them.

            • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ultimately, they have no obligation to provide you something of value for free, and given that you do apparently use YouTube, they are objectively providing you something of value. They’re completely within their rights to not do that.

          • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, I don’t, but it isn’t my problem.

            Google makes enough money as is, I don’t really care if the make poor decisions and end up with an unviable business model. I’ll do other things with my time.

            I don’t really care about Google’s wellbeing. I pay directly to the content creators I like and I hate seeing ads anywhere in my life and I’m willing to put in time and effort to make sure I see as few as possible.

            If they say that the marketing data they scrape from user activity isn’t enough for em, well, sucks to suck I guess.

            • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t really care if the make poor decisions and end up with an unviable business model. I’ll do other things with my time.

              Alternatively, they’ll take steps towards a more viable business model, and you’ll also find other things to do with your time.

              I’m willing to put in time and effort to make sure I see as few as possible.

              You can zap all ads forever with a few minutes and a credit card, if you’re willing.

              • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That’s the thing with ads. They’re a thorn in my side. That Google puts there.

                If you were charging me to remove the thorns you put in my side, I’d be belligerent towards you. And I ain’t gonna give ya money.

                Is YouTube running at a loss, anyway? Or is Google just trying to squeeze more money outta its products? Maybe they should be content with the profits they got. Some quick searching says it generates somewhere in the realm of $29,000,000,000 in revenue annually. I imagine it’s likely they can afford to not be so damn greedy.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For me personally, I would rather pay for a service than with my time via ads.

        That said, the services provided these days are unreliable, gatekept, metered and not enjoyable. Why should I pay for shitty service?

        Therefore I’m only left with one option and my wellies are strapped tight! 🫡

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, if YouTube were truly so terrible that you think it offers no real value, you wouldn’t use it at all. If you yourself don’t use it, that’s all well and good, but if you do still use it anyway but block ads, then you’re admitting that it offers some amount of actual value while refusing to pay for it. In that case, it’s hardly unreasonable for YouTube to decide to not take on the cost of offering the service to those that aren’t going to pay for it. You’d probably be more than a little annoyed if your boss told you that you’ll be working extra hours for free.

      • rebul@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mind paying for YouTube content. I do mind their data harvesting, however. Figured out that my life isn’t diminished at all without Youtube.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine being so cocky that you think pirated YouTube videos can’t be a thing.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can however, almost certainly correctly, predict that most people are not going to care enough to bother pirating YouTube videos, especially given how many people watch YouTube on phones or smart TVs now.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have a separate app just to watch YouTube through which lets me subscribe and all the rest without an account and without ads and it was Uber easy to install.

        I think you underestimate how much pirates and the opposition truly hate google and their practices and the lengths they will go to in order to get the content they want.

        “Let’s hook Americans on consumerism and turn them into animals, then we can surprise pikachu when said animals eat our faces”

        🤷🏻‍♂️ I just work here

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you underestimate how much pirates and the opposition truly hate google and their practices and the lengths they will go to in order to get the content they want.

          I think you’re dramatically overestimating how many people actually care about this, or any tech issue, enough to “truly hate Google”. The vast majority of Android users have never sideloaded an app and don’t even know what that means, while obviously that’s not doable on iPhones at all.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey Google, you gotta remember that you won’t get any ad revenue from people who get fed up with your shit and just stop going to YouTube.

  • someguy@pleroma.someotherguy.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    @TangledHyphae @technology
    Then, use a program that is a different YouTube Front End.

    On Android phones, you can download NewPipe or LibreTube from the F-Droid store. These will allow you to subscribe to channels and to watch without ads.

    You can use Invidious instances or you can setup your own to watch through a website.
    Invidious Instances: https://docs.invidious.io/instances
    Invidious GitHub Code: https://github.com/iv-org/invidious

    Because YouTube does not pay most creators enough to live on, please support your favorite YouTubers using Patreon, Locals, or wherever.