• NixDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work for an auto company. I can tell you they don’t want mass transit because it hurts profits. They would much rather jack up the cost of vehicles, offer deals on leases, and keep people locked into getting a new vehicle every few years. Just keep the machine running and fuck anything except their profits. You will see how shady the auto industry is once the strike happens next week

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You would need much less material and that’s bad for economy.

    Or to reframe it: the economy is bad for the environment.

  • waraukaeru@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a dead-simple concept that can be applied to everything: public money should only be used for public services. If the private sector is viable, it shouldn’t need public money to prop it up.

    Public money should fund public transit. No public money for private transport infrastructure.

    Public money should fund public schools. No public subsidies for charter and private schools.

    Public money should fund public health care. No public funding should be wasted on propping up a wasteful private healthcare industry. ACA wastes so much money buying insurance for people when we could just build public hospitals and public clinics.

    It’s not that private industry shouldn’t exist. It’s just that private industry, conceptually, shouldn’t need to be propped up by social funding. But currently it is. And it’s a tremendous waste of money. Public money should only fund public programs. So simple.

    • kozy138@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aren’t bike lanes technically “private transport infrastructure” though?

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please define “private transport infrastructure”…

      Like, do you mean roads and lanes on private property, where the property owner can legally post a “No Trespassing” sign?

      Because if that’s not what you mean, then pretty much every transportation path is public transportation.

  • pathief@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really hate driving but it takes me 30 min to drive somewhere where public transportation takes me 2 hours. Driving saves me 3 hours a day.

    If public transportation was good, I wouldn’t drive.

    • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is exactly the point of this meme. The resource allocation for building car infrastructure has been massive since the '60s while transit has been left behind as it is way less of a oppurtunity for car manufacturers and oil companies to profit from it and yeah, they do have a saying bigger than yours when it comes to deciding your country’s politics. (See corruptionlobbying)

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it means rebuilding cities. We should absolutely do it, but entirely reworking how everyone gets around is gonna take a while even best case scenario. But that’s why we should get started now!

        • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We already bulldozed and rebuilt our cities for the car, so there’s certainly no reason we can’t do it again. It should be easier this time, though, as the main things we have to demolish are parking lots and stroads, not entire city blocks of dense housing. See Cincinnati below:

      • pathief@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        From my interpretation, this meme suggests we should just stop building cars. The fact we are buying so many cars is just a testament on how bad public transportation is. Even with traffic I still manage to get 1 hour and half faster than public transportation by train + subway.

        I wish the solution was as simples as a resource redirection, but unfortunately it would require some city planning and possibly rebuilding around public transportation. Not gonna happen, I guess.

  • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have any of you tried getting 3 kids around town with public transport? 10 minutes of kids songs in the car = 45 minutes of screaming and accusatory stares in the bus.

  • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the concept of 15 minute cities/suburbs. You can get anywhere you need within 15 minutes, whether by public transport, bike, walking or car.

    • garden_boi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t the point of a 15 minute city that you can get anywhere within 15 minutes without a car?

      (By the way, from a European standpoint it sounds really funny that 15 minute cities are not a reality for you. Like, why would you ever build a city differently in the first place?)

      • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like, why would you ever build a city differently in the first place?

        Exactly. Unfortunately, in Australia, we tend to borrow stupid ideas from the US to make money and have sprawling suburbs with zero amenity.

        For instance, we had a new suburbian development within 20km from the CBD with the promise of schools, community centres etc. in the early 2000s. When all the houses were bought and built, suddenly there’s no money for amenities so they just sold the land to developers who then put more houses in. Now the only way to get anything you need is by car because there’s no train or buses because it was supposed to be accessible by bike/walking but now isn’t. And not to mention gridlock of vehicles looking to get out of the suburbs for food etc. out of the one intersection provided.

        I would love 15min cities without cars for my country but the attitude to cars here is similar to the attitude about guns in the US.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is awesome because the point of this meme template is that Patrick has bad ideas, just like how divesting totally from cars in the US is a bad idea.

  • Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because planned economies are a terrible idea. We would be doing this efficiently and organically if the demand for bikes and public transportation was higher and the demand for cars was lower.

    Why don’t we uproot all our vegetable crops and grow cherry trees? Cherries are delicious so this is obviously a great idea!

    The only reason you have food on your plate is because economies adjust incrementally from the ground up, not all at once from the top down.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What we have is a transportation economy that’s been planned by car companies. From demonizing “Jay Walkers”, to buying trolley companies to shut them down.

      Even today, where small trucks stop being produced in order to avoid emission restrictions. Along with marketing, that falsely claims improved safety of the larger, more expensive, more profitable large trucks.

      Whenever a market is dominated by a small enough group of companies, they start planning how it will work.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a horrendous comparison. You could have had an arguable point if other countries weren’t already doing it.

    • diffaldo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Demand for public transport will not increase because it continues to be underfunded.

      • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Under-founds public transportation until all that’s left is a old dirty bus going in along a useless route every 6 hours. Builds massive highways, parking lots and roads that make it “easy” to drive and impossible to walk or cycle, cuts gas taxes. WOAH GUYS, people are buying cars because they love them! We should give them more funding and keep de-funding transit projects

    • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here comes the guy with the degree in economics and a lot of free time lmfao. It must be really difficult to misunderstand such a simple meme but here, I will help you out: MAYBE the spendings our governements “plan” (uuuh scary buzz word) on: car infrastructure (go check how much your country spends on it), gas tax cuts, road maintenance, healthcare costs related to car accidents (you don’t obviously “plan” those but they are nonetheless a cost for a society), just MAYBE, they could be decresed in favor of public transportation? Cycling infrastructure?

      “BuT tHe dEmAnD fOr CarS iS sO hIgh!!1!1 LeT tHe fReE mArKet ChOoSe wHaT pEoPlE wAnT.”

      Nice free market you got there when outside its all roads and parking lots (tax-paid), with no sidewalks/cycleways, and the only bus/train going to where you need to has a ride every 6 hours. Im sure people will buy a car to get around because they love it so much.

      Why don’t we uproot all our vegetable cropsmodes of transportation and grow car trees? Cars are delicious so this is obviously a great idea!

      • car manufactures in the '60s
      • Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also have a degree in economics (and computer science, fwiw). We agree that the incentive structures in the United States are fucked up. I was just answering the question in the meme with regards to manufacturing decisions and how/why they’re made. Discontinuing our perverse car-centric subsidy schemes would be a great way to steer demand and supply away from cars.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy shit can you imagine? If we’d take all the investments that are done on a yearly basis for cars and we stuff that in trains, busses and bikes and their infrastructure?

    We’d get walkable cities, cities would get more tax income, we’d all get healthier, we’d have tonnes of money left for parks… and we’d actually for once really do something to stoo climate change to boot

    Ahhh to dream…it’s so nice. The world could be so pretty if people just weren’t such dumb egocentric assholes.