• Tiny_Charity4151@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ok, but lots of big companies just break the law and then say “change it or we will fucking burry you in ads that say you rape turtles” and then magically the law is changed to accommodate them. It’s the Silicon Valley playbook.

  • Radium@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Legacy has switched to the full propaganda against ev model instead shrug

    • nyconx@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      To create an affordable EV vehicle at a price that still allows the company to make money will take time and resources invested in creating the infostructure to do so. The people at the helm of the company now will not be there when this comes to fruition so there is no motivation for them to reduce their company profits for something that will hurt them during their tenure.

      • heatedhammer@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The switch to EVs will have winners and losers, companies that are run like this will probably fall within the loser camp.

        • Twombls@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Eh Ford specifically sells a shitload of trucks. Most vehicles they sell are trucks. Trucks make most of their profit. And trucks will still allowed to be combustion for a while

  • dima1109@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    well, ford told them they had to, among other things, hire and train competent and knowledgeable sales and service staff, and that’s just a bridge too far for your typical car dealer