• Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago
    1. Search for ‘Chrome’ or ‘Microsoft Edge’
    2. Download your preferred web browser

    I’m failing to understand what’s the need of searching for Chrome or Edge to install Firefox

    • MDKAOD@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Per this comment, and the project itself, Firefox isn’t supported.

      Although, it seems the about page now suggests Firefox is supported. So perhaps the article has been quickly rendered out of date.

  • MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This entire article is utterly baffling if you know anything at all about what they’re talking about. What the absolute hell did I just read?

    • MDKAOD@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Here’s my logic. You can be elitist and know how to do the thing that this article is conveying already. Lemmy is populated by an overwhelming number of users who are technically capable of doing the thing this article is conveying. But there’s another wave of complaints that Lemmy lacks content, therefore cannot grow. This is content. And I submitted it, in the hopes that someone who is less technical doesn’t give up on this platform and go elsewhere.

      The conversations revolving around the lack of content on lemmy aren’t taking into consideration the success of other reddit alternatives like Tildes. Tildes is busier than lemmy. Nurture the platform, criticize the writing if you must, but be constructive. If you have something to add to the conversation, add it.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, I am now baffled about two pieces of content, so… that worked?

        Look, I don’t mind the link being up here. It’s fine.

        But if I had stumbled upon it I’d very much have noted somewhere that
        a) you could play DOS games on the Deck since day one.
        b) there are many ways to run DOSbox on Deck, including through Retroarch and emudeck
        c) there are plenty of ways to buy and play DOS games legitimately that way, especially by purchasing GOG builds that come with the original DOS files as a bonus, and
        d) that if the entire point of a product is to streamline the look and feel of the process to match Steam Big Picture/SteamOS but it requires a bunch of command line stuff in desktop mode maybe it’s not ready for prime time, or at least not as much as EmuDeck is. But also,
        e) there are probably much easier ways to get a third party browser to boot up on SteamOS and go to this place than doing all that, right?

        I don’t understand how this piece came together, why it’s framed the way it is or what it’s even trying to say. I do understand posting it, although maybe not for any of those reasons you list. I don’t think I’m being elitist here, there are much, much easier ways to point people to ways of playing DOS games on the Deck that require less fiddling than this and the innovative bits aren’t the ones being mentioned in the article, which just adds to the confusion.

        On the other subject you bring up… I genuinely think that just engaging with this space in the way that makes more sense to you works better to generate new engagement than trying to game the system to promote people not going on Reddit. But then, I was never on Reddit in the first place and I do enjoy the 90s forum board feel of this iteration of it, so who knows.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t understand? You can download Dosbox and Dosbox-X in desktop mode and add them to Steam like other apps. Why do you need a website?