And no IPad version to

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it is, and because of who owns it, I would even prefer that to an unsandboxed closed source native binary.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because the vast, vast, VAST majority of people have no idea that many apps are just showing a website. Also, the app version is almost always more efficient in terms of precious phone screen real estate compared to a browser. Apps also remember who you are so you don’t have to login. It isn’t hard to understand why people like them.

          That said, many apps are horrible from a privacy perspective. But that is largely hidden from the average user, most of whom simply don’t think much about online privacy anyway.

          I hope the ubiquity of irritating ads are the thin edge of the wedge that gets more people interested in ad-blocking, and then perhaps online privacy more generally.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      works without a phone nearby nowadays?

      Last time I checked it kicked me out for no reason… But in a nutshell yes.

    • doofer_name@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. No sane linux user should.

      Und: Hubi ist Linux Nutzer konfirmiert. - 2023, koloriert

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t like WhatsApp, but some people simply refuse to use anything else (“better”) and the web clients can bridge the gap but it’s extremely annoying not being able to answer a call with a person you are texting

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy, I don’t talk to such people. They can have my email or phone number if truly necessary. Yes, same for family or work, just not using Meta products for communication. Surprisingly enough people do understand.

        • “Easy, I don’t talk to such people”

          so you don’t talk to most people, outside of coworkers, family and other weirdos

          T. Care about privacy, also care about having a social life without being an annoying weirdo

          • utopiah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It’s called having standards.

            OK provocation aside yes, you actually have to stand for what you believe in. For some people it means not going to a meat restaurants, for others, like me, it means not accepting a WhatsApp chat or a Google Drive share. You also do that but because it’s either so ingrained or socially accepted you do not even notice anymore. Your standards are definitely not mine but if neither of us do push back, then we as a society go backward IMHO (even knowing my standards are not yours, assuming at least some of us do think and act based on new knowledge rather than random beliefs). So… yes it means my circle of acquaintances is not the most inclusive but I do accept boundaries and if it means someone is toxic according to my perspective, they are out, simple.

            PS: you actually have no idea what my social life is. You literally can not judge if it’s “richer” or “poorer” than anyone else.

    • Jagermo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Element one via bridges and run WhatsApp on an old phone - that’s the most I will allow an app from meta in my enviroment

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But please tell your contacts that you’re using bridges, if you haven’t already.

        You are effectively giving away encryption keys to a third party, since those messages need to be decrypted and re-encrypted mid-transit.
        Everyone who is part of the chats you use bridges with deserves to know about that fact, at least.

        • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Couple reasons:

          WhatsApp was its own company, took advantage of an open market in EU where SMS (and “international” phone calls?) were extra rate charges on mobile phones. Once every one got accustomed to using whatsapp Meta took it over and now we’re stuck with it.

        • meliaesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To communicate with anyone outside of the US, where it is extremely popular and is the main interaction with many businesses as well.

        • Pfnic@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s almost impossible not to sadly, at least if you want to reach everybody in ypur contacts… It was the first popular messaging app here and inertia prevents people from moving to better alternatives now.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think a lot of tech-savvy adults care about E2E on blue iMessage bubbles. I won’t talk about sensitive information via green, that’s all going to signal.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imma burst your bubble (pun intended) but that’s such a small part of the population and even such a small part of the tech savvy population that I don’t think it’s much of an argument.

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s fair! I’m just going by my own experiences. But I have a lot of tech-savvy friends and acquaintances and even many non-tech-savvy mates are into Signal vs SMS because it’s secure, has great audio/video chat, and it’s not owned by shudders Facebook. I personally do not touch any google or Facebook products or services.

          • Ziglin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Apple gives it funny colours? Google messages just change saturation. Also for some reason I can’t send RCS (and e2e encrypted) messages to my relatives with apple phones. But I got most of them to use Signal :>

            • Lolors17@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just recently read something about, that apple needs to use RCS by the end of 2023.

              • Ziglin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I actually heard the same on techlinked today, but apparently apple doesn’t seem to be interested in e2e encryption for their RCS messages.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just use discord via the browser. Why would I allow it to harvest my data as an app?

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because the desktop app works without having your phone around, if I remember correctly. It’s a relatively recent feature.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The web version isn’t a standalone client like Signal, which registers as an additional device with e2e. WhatsApp web communicates with the WhatsApp app, so it doesn’t work if the phone isn’t connected to the internet (in early versions it had to be the same network, if I remember correctly).

            I believe WA introduced a feature which allowed the desktop app to function standalone like Signal. Signal Desktop adds a second device with it’s own keys, so contacts send automatically messages to two devices. I’m not sure if it works the same for WA, and if they even have the feature. I don’t have a compatible desktop.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if it exists, then it does not have to be good. Look at Microsoft Teams.

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    My MF smartwatch has WhatsApp but still no Linux version.

  • Andrew@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You shouldn’t use this app in the first place. It had many data breaches and it copy everything from Telegram (maybe everyone copies, but I don’t use other apps). I only mainly use Telegram and Matrix.

    • n1ved@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s impossible to convince that to friends and family. In my country everyone use WhatsApp as primary messaging app . It’s kind of like iMessage situation in US

      • Andrew@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s nice that a lot of my surroundings have finally jumped to Telegram. Previously it was Viber (bleh). But it’s much hard to go to Matrix because it’s much much less feature rich and less polished then Telegram. I can easily use it as a basic text messenger, but that’s about it. So Telegram is a solid middle ground. Can’t wait for the multi server Matrix accounts.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Facebook couldn’t bother making a proper Android app for years. Now you want them to make Linux apps? The likelihood is small…

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neither of which run well on Linux. Don’t use proprietary software when there are other options

        • Pyro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been running Discord just fine on Linux. It’s just a web wrapper, after all. What issues have you been having with it?

        • _user_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Last time I tried Viber, it ran fine on Linux, what issues have you had with it?

          Discord also works pretty well, minus the white flashing when scrolling through GIFs for me

          • Octopus@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had a problem with Viber on Linux, it crashed when picking up or starting a call, but that was quickly fixed.

            • _user_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Admittedly haven’t tried calling with it, that being said I still need to reinstall it on my main laptop (only recently switched to Linux on that, was using an old laptop with Linux before that), so I’ll try some stuff again

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Viber and Discord aren’t free (libre) software and should be avoided. I’ve never ran them because of that reason. However, I’ve heard lots of complaints of proprietary mainstream applications not being great on Linux.

            • dmrzl@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Neither of which run well on Linux.”

              “I’ve never ran them because of that reason.”

              Yikes.

  • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are plenty of desktop wrappers available for the Web version. I don’t use WhatsApp often but from my experience it seems fairly similar to the Windows desktop app

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Afaik they created a Windows client that’s native sort of recently and I’m pretty sure it’s a better experience than the web version because that’s one slow as hell to initially load for me.