• ret990@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is such nonsense. You can cite the problems with Arsenals sleeve sponsor, though I’d bet the poster would struggle to actually articulate what they are. But equating a sponsorship from a country’s tourist board for a football team to the UKs illegal and heartless policy to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is pathetic.

    Really, what Arsenal and all clubs should worry about from this ruling is trying to find a way to annex themselves from the UK if you find this problematic.

    Oh shocker, posted by a Newcastle flair. We’ve been in your head rent free for so long now that we must qualify for squatters rights. You got the 3 points. Cheer up

    So we’re not in any doubt. Arsenal may be sponsored by an airline from UAE. They may have a sponsorship with the Rwanda tourist board. Newcastle are owned by a regime, that in September, executed the 100th person this year as capital punishment. When all you Geordies were celebrating a return to the CL at the end of last season, loving your owners, the same regime was executing 7 18 year olds for ‘crimes’ committed when they were children. One was 12 when they committed the egregious crime of protesting the regime.

    And here Newcastle fans are, point scoring over shirt sponsorships. Cant even be as brave as a 12 year old. Pathetic and shameless.

  • cbarksLFC@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not trying to throw shade at Arsenal but are we suprised? Supposedly the whole Ozil stuff was because of his stance with what the Chinese are doing to the Uighur Muslims. Not sure if this was ever confirmed but it still is discussed somewhat from time to time.

    Let’s be honest no club would really cancel a large sponsorship deal. They only get involved in political issues when it suits the clubs and their image. This isn’t direct at Arsenal before fans get on my back, talking about ALL clubs

  • Mrpetey22@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Promoting and boosting development in a country isn’t equal to being owned by a government btw.

    Newcastle fan trying to justify their clubs owners. Sad day

  • Thedudeofmanchester@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am a United fan but OP here is just clutching on straws to justify their ownership. Looks like Arsenal is living rent free in your head and i am not surprised a Newcastle fan is coming out calling Arsenal “hypocrite” when your ownership itself is a hypocrisy issue. Arsenal were in the first division even as far as my granddad goes and they are embodiment of British football just like United unlike a division 2 scrap club climbing ladders using Oil money funded from human abusive states. Downvoting this post as OP is rattling up the Arsenal fans to farm karma. Such an embarrassment of a club and a fanbase really pathetic.

  • MarcusZXR@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shared in to both subs by Newcastle supporters. I see the propaganda machine is in full swing.

  • Thedudeofmanchester@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well by your logic the emirates or fly emirates which is a shirt sponsor for Arsenal should also be criticised right? If then our historical FA Cup which is now being sponsored by the Emirates is called the Emirates FA Cup should also be banned right? I don’t see anyone criticising it or questioning it whereas you Newcastle oil fcks criticize a shirt sponsor. Then in your minds you lot must be against the FA equivalent to the British government equivalent to you being anti-national. Absolute Embarrassment the fanbase of Newcastle has become