• morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    11 months ago

    physics majors when they’re asked to apply their knowledge (they’ve never been outside of the lab)

  • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you ask a scientist what pi is, they will tell you it equals 3.14159. If you ask a mathematician, they will tell you pi equals the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter. If you ask an engineer, they will say “about 3, but let’s round it up to 5 to be safe.”

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d replace scientist to something more precise like physicist because usually people consider mathematicians as scientists even if it depends on definitions.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        usually people consider mathematicians as scientists

        Yikes!

        … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Feel free! I actually just googled it because I couldn’t exactly remember it. I’d use contractions too and make it less formal sounding.

  • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What’s the first indicator a scientist tried to build their own experiment using the soldering station ?

    The smell of burnt fingers.

    What’s the scientist waiting for sitting in front of their own experiment ?

    Waiting for the infinite loop they coded to finish after they claimed they didn’t need the engineer’s help to write the code in their experiment.

    How many scientists do you need to change a light bulb ?

    Theoretically just one, but it can take several until one of them can call an engineer and admit they only know how to change light bulbs theoretically.

    What does a scientist call an electrolytic capacitor ?

    Acid distribution subsystem.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Can I lick the science?”

      “Nothing else has made the code work so ya might as well!”

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ask a physician to build a bridge, it collapse but he knows exactly how and why it collapsed.

    Ask an engineer to do it, it holds but he has no idea how it’s holding together.

    • Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the word you’re looking for is physicist. A physician is a medical doctor (as in a person that treats sick people). A physicist is a person that studies physics (as in a person that knows how to solve word problems involving pool tables).

    • Zacryon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Depends on the specific engineering branch. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Sometimes nothing at all. But all engineering branches share one thing with physics: math.

    • Cowbee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Engineering is just the economical application of applied physics, without Physicists Engineers work off faulty knowledge, without Engineers nothing gets designed.

      The level of understanding an Engineer needs, however, is purely within the practical and economical, while Physicists understandably have more in-depth knowledge.

  • Darkonion@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Engineering is more like accounting, but for objects instead of money. Tables, rule books, and lobbyists.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hey we understand plenty! Well the parts we have to to make the thing not go boom anyways…

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m sure you didn’t mean it, but given the dearth of women in engineering, there’s an interpretation of this meme that’s kinda sexist.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago
          1. You could replace either character and the meme would still work. Sometimes, things are just a joke.
          2. I’m not responsible for bigots who misinterpret things based on their own biases.
          3. Woke scolding only divides people who should be allies instead of addressing those who are the problem (see 2).
              • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                so glad you were here to explain to me the error of my ways, whatever would i do without your enlightened understanding of marxism🙄

                if you think people complaining about “woke scolds” aren’t 99% conservatives then idk what to tell you dog, particularly in the context of “actually being concerned about social issues pushes people into reaction!”

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            If 1) is true then taking a stand on 2) and 3) is pointless at best and callous at worst.

            Like you said, the joke works equally well with the genders reversed to remove the possibility of misinterpretation.

            • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I understand, however, I feel that the critique of this meme is an overreach and, frankly, misdirected. By focusing on this as a problem, we risk diverting attention from the real, substantive issues that need our energy and advocacy. It’s important to pick our battles wisely and concentrate on fighting blatant sexism and inequality, rather than reading into harmless humor. We do a disservice to the cause by attacking allies over perceived slights that, in reality, are neutral and unrelated to the broader struggles women face in STEM. Regardless of who is in this meme, it does not effect my position as a woman in STEM in any way.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m not trying to attack you or anything. I’m not calling you a sexist and throughout this whole interaction I’ve given you maximal benefit of the doubt about your intentions.

                All I wanted to do is point out that this meme could be read to have an unintended negative meaning, a point which I don’t think you’ve even disagreed with.

                If a big part of why this meme is okay to you is the fact that you’re a woman in STEM them at least men should be aware that it might be interpreted differently if they share it or spread it around. It is, after all, a meme.

  • Skybreaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    As someone with a degree in physics who ended up in an engineering role, I approve of this meme.

    • beneeney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fr, what can you do with a physics degree except teach people physics

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Applied physics is a thing. Lots of jobs there. Geophysics, biophysics, engineering physics (yes, that’s a thing…)