• rufotris@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The Chronos 4K12 is available to preorder now, and the first batch of cameras will ship in February 2024. Prices start at $14,495 for the 64GB model and $15,995 for the 128GB version.

    The quicker Chronos Q12 is also available to order now, with shipping expected to commence in March. The 64GB version costs $19,995, while the 128GB model is $21,995.”

    Ok if I win the lottery I’ll consider it.

  • Ok-Yogurtcloset-2735@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some day, this tech will be affordable for everyone. But, for now, it’s still out of most people’s price range other than professionals.

  • Bortaman@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We got the chronos 2.1 at work to develop a machine that sorts 15000 grain per second. For the price ($7000) it was absolutely fantastic and a crucial tool for us. I’ve borrowed it for some projects back home and you can get really nice footage with it.

    I definitely wouldn’t mind this though

    • Pudi2000@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Got any nice pics to share uncompressed? Guessing they’re on the order of a GB?

      • Bortaman@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not shoting anything very interesting and I haven’t used it in over a year so I don’t have any uncompressed stuff easily available. But please enjoy the following samples.

        Protein explosion

        Blow job

      • techieman33@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Each year individual frame isn’t that big. It’s only a 1080p image. It’s just that when you capture 15,000 a second it adds up fast.

      • reelfilmgeek@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not the person you are responding too but I’ll try to find some of my Chronos 2.1 footage to share in the later if you want. And yeah the data rates are not fun, had to upgrade my NAS a lot quicker once I got the camera

        • Pudi2000@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would, but maybe you want to have like 25 likes to make sure more people than I are interested. Wouldn’t want you to spend time if it’s only me and a couple other peeps.

  • RobXIII@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just bought one of these! 20k seemed reasonable! I came in here to excitedly type this while parking in down town San Fran, leaving it on my front seat.

    /what was that breaking glass noise?

  • FerociousPancake@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you kidding me I LITERALLY JUST BOUGHT A 2.1!!! God damnit now I’m gonna be broke because I’ve got to pick this one up…

  • ChunkyDay@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is affordable in quotes?

    For what you’re getting here this is incredibly affordable. An Epic Red camera (not the base model Komodo) starts at $18,000. And that’s a normal cinema camera.

  • diacewrb@alien.topOPB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Prices start at $14,495 for the 64GB model and $15,995 for the 128GB version.

    This make apple’s ssd pricing look reasonable in comparison.

    • ChunkyDay@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      YOu have no clue what a professional camera is then. This is laughably affordable.

      • QuerulousPanda@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        there is actually a different ‘budget’ high speed camera that writes directly to an ssd specifically for speed reasons. i don’t think it compares to the chronos cameras in terms of raw performance but it’s still pretty cool.

        the chronos cameras are such an awesome example of the dedication of one dude and then a small team afterwards.

  • Crafty-Run-6559@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does that mean its internal storage fills up in less than 2 minutes?

    Damn.

    And you’re going to need like 100gb ethernet to keep it continuously going?

    • FerociousPancake@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 2.1 works in a similar way… I have the 2.1 and it has 16GB, so it records in a loop and captures the last 5 seconds of footage, and you press a trigger to stop it. Then it has a external SSD that is plugged into it and you save the clip onto there. It’s just a different type of system because you’re right, at such high frame rates and resolution it uses up a ton of storage space super quick. The FreeFly cameras have an internal 2TB SSD which I like better. But with high speed cameras you’re usually filming stuff that happens super quickly, so the 5 second rule isn’t too much of an issue. Some phantom cameras can only do like 2 seconds.

    • insomniac-55@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t film two minutes of realtime with a high speed camera. It would take years to play back.

      You record on a loop (constantly erasing a few seconds of realtime) on the internal RAM, and when you trigger the camera, you save a little bit of footage before and after the event. This can still be hours of footage when played back at 30 fps. You only need an SSD or regular old ethernet to download the saved footage.

    • FerociousPancake@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is affordable per say if you’re in that market (I am so I know it well.) A phantom high speed camera that can do 30,000 FPS, which is one of your only other options, can run $80-200K. These aren’t cameras that the average person gets to just shoot a few slow mo clips and have fun. They’re for research, filmmakers, and YouTubers who film explosions and other super fast stuff.