• inssein@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    seeing two suppliers is never a good feeling, loto incoming on the screens.

    • Major_Quarter_2638@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s like the Apple (I’m thinking about the iPhone Xr) that use at least two display manufacturers there is no real difference between the two except the screen

      • obi1kenobi1@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that will be the case because Panelook doesn’t have any 7.4” 1280x800 OLEDs in their database. That means these aren’t off-the-shelf panels with mix and match quality, they’re something valve is custom ordering to their own specs. That happens all the time and usually you can’t tell the difference.

  • arjman@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Praying for Samsung but knowing I’ll probably get stuck with the sloppy seconds.

    • Glodraph@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure about that, smasung oleds suck ass for image retention compare to, let’s say, lg.

  • Akito_Fire@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, why can’t things be simple… Most reviewers probably had the Samsung panel (which is like the Switch OLED one)

  • ThatLastGenGamer@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exactly what’s the assumed risk here? What would be the possible disadvantages of receiving one screen VS the other? I’ve owned OLEDs since the LG C8 and only ever had problems with horizontal stripes with a B9. Other than that, I had no reason to complain about an LG C8 and my current C1, C2 and Switch OLED. The closest that comes to being an issue is the Switch’s tint shift when using auto brightness.

  • Genio88@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if that was true, as long as both display reach 600 nits and 1000 nits in hdr content as advertised, it will be fine, it’s not like only Samsung can do good Oled display, even iPhones used BOE displays before

  • HisDivineOrder@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the review units are custom primo quality and the rest of us get lower tier screens. No wonder they’re so amazed.

  • Lily20171@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Samsung is the best and I would prefer it but frankly I’d rather not know lol I did figure they would be involved somehow.

  • TunaPablito@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So…your OLED SD arrives. Do you check which display you got or just ignore it and be happy :)

    • invert16@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how everyone is now freaking out over the smallest details instead of just taking measured responses. They’re acting like the new oled panel will be worse than the og one. It’s so funny it’s sad 😔

  • aaronaapje@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does Samsung produce classic OLEDs or do they by default use their quantum dot technology?