Local student is being denied the role for not be assigned male at birth. Now they’ve decided that Oklahoma is too controversial of a play and includes graphic scenes not fit for minors so they’re pulling the whole show. Bunch of asshats at Sherman, TX ISD.

Edit: I will try to answer any comments I can. I do not personally know the student. I can’t really speak for trans folks as I’m just an ally who wants better for this kiddo and all trans people.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, because it’s not like theater has a longstanding history of having people play characters that are a different sex from the one they were born as or anything…

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    There isn’t even an attempt to suggest that there is some form of greater good at play here. They just apologetically do it and make no excuses. This is oppression, plain and simple.

    • Kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now they’re acting like it was never about Max and that it was the adult themes in “Oklahoma” . They dropped the gender rule and the play is postponed until January. No promise of Max keeping his role. I’ll be surprised if they aren’t buying time so the original lead can take the part back.

    • Kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something Sherman ISD has a history of doing. A few years ago they tried to block the creation of a LGBT student group.

    • Kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s how this whole damned town government is. It’s a crooked city run by crooked construction company owners, contractors, and other people in the housing market. They put house building before anything else in the town to the point of not enforcing ANY building codes against house builders, burning massive pies of brush in the middle of a heavily populated area for land clearing, and so much more. Their response? Landowners have a right to develop their land. I could go on for hours listing the corruption here, but I digress.

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    disgusting. this policy wouldn’t exist if he didn’t get a lead role. it’s such obvious oppression

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah people assigned as female are better at acting like a man

      /s but not in a transphobic way