• PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Absolutely love Formula 1, been a fan for 30 years, find the whole cutting edge technology and it’s public applications fascinating…

    …but yeah lol fuck the circus. Formula 1 has gone from pure greed on the organisation front to unadulterated morally bankrupt and taking-the-piss greed. Saudi, Qatar, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi… yeah nah fuck that noise, a bit of fire under Liberty Media’s chair would do them good.

    It runs the risk of fucking the Vegas fanbase off 2005-stylez, but hey it can’t have been too terrible if there’s now three US races on the calendar.

    • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree, this GP need to be a catastrophe, it’s time Stefano get a reality check.

    • CubbyTustard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      I find the fact that the racing fuel used contains lead to be absolute insanity. We know there are zero safe limits but car go faster so oh well, fuck every community around a race track i guess.

      • farcaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you’re worried about leaded fuels (and I agree, you should be) then don’t look up next time a small plane flies over… They’re almost all still using leaded Avgas :\

        • 1847953620@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Some scientist took to mapping IQ levels geographically and everyone who lives downwind of a small airport has a consistent and directly proportional drop to the average concentration of airborne lead for about 1-4 miles surrounding them. The drops in IQ even perfectly match the wind patterns. It’s insane. If you live really close to a small airport, pack up and move away.

          It’s also crazy that they allowed small aircraft to get away with not having to follow the same fuel regulations, it’s really a small difference in cost, our politicians are just too bought out.

          Edit: but also, the rest of us likely breathe it in as well, just not as much, and we haven’t figured out exactly how much; ostensibly because it spreads out too much and thus affects everyone more evenly. Yay “energy” corporations and capitalism.

          • karakoram@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Aviation regulations are written in blood. There’s a reason general aviation is stuck with technology developed in the 50s and 60s: innovating is so expensive from a compliance standpoint and production volume so low that new technologies enter that space at a glacial pace. A new Jet-A burning piston engine is only available in airframes that cost $1M+ and the cost of retrofitting in older airframes is prohibitive. If we weren’t so restrictive on the regulations, capitalism would offer a solution at a vastly reduced price point. So, would you rather have less provably safe aircraft, leaded avgas, or the complete prohibition of aircraft that make up the vast majority of the GA population?

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        “Zero safe limits” has a lot to do with the scale. While it can’t be good for those in attendance, between the relative infrequency of races, limited number of cars on the field, and general use of batteries even in the ICE leagues (let alone caring about emissions for efficiency purposes), it is probably perfectly fine. Or, more pointedly, all the OTHER emissions are likely a much bigger concern.

        Also, the number of safety and societal dangers of F1 go WELL beyond just dangerous fuel. Like, I enjoy watching the occasional race. But holy shit does F1 make pro wrestling look “not THAT bad…”

        • aelwero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Their point has validity on any scale though… I’m generally not a fan of “zero tolerance” in any context, but the context here is ostensibly an intentionally equalized playing field, meaning that a zero tolerance policy on any aspect is inherently fair… So there’s really no excuse for accepting environmental hazards…

          The assertion that allowance of additives (any additives that pose environmental/spectator hazards) has no benefit other than “car go fast”, is a solid point.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The waste from the cars, the maintenance, transportation, and the event itself go above and beyond. Yes, everyone totally keeps the fancy kitty litter around to get every single leak and so forth. Sure…

            Not to mention the increased exhaust.

            As for scale: Yes, it really does matter.

            Rough numbers time.

            • According to chatgpt, an F1 car has a max fuel capacity of 110 kg per race. Obviously they try to avoid using all of that for a range of reasons, but sure. Not gonna bother to write the math, but that is about 39.29 gallons.
            • Roughly 20 cars on the starting grid, and let’s assume for the sake of easy math that every car used a full tank for practice, both rounds of qualifiers, and the race itself. So 4*39.29*20=3143 gallons per race for the cars alone.
            • Still chatgpt because the window is open, but the average sedan has 12-18 gallons tanks.
            • 3143 / 12 = 261 cars. 261 cars use the amount of fuel used in a single F1 race in between trips to the gas station.
            • Still using chatgpt: average attendance numbers range from 10k to 100k spectators.

            So yeah. The amount of fuel used in a given F1 race is a drop in the bucket relative to just how much is used by the cars that bring people to watch them. And I have intentionally not included the trucks used to transport the f1 cars or even the trains and boats.

            And that is why, while it isn’t good and I am opposed to it, the lead that may or may not still be used in F1 fuel (chat gpt says no, random ass quora page says 5 mg/L. Whereas, if there were even trace amounts of lead in the gas that gets everyone else to the F1 race…

            The environmental impact of an F1 race, let alone a season, is horrendous. Even if we are talking formula E or whatever the current pure electric league is. And fixating on older fuel composition in the light of that is, quite frankly, asinine and self defeating.

            Hell, the dirt and dust around the more rural tracks probably has MUCH more lead than the fuel.

      • evulhotdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        For Formula 1 cars it is 5mg/l. Old four star leaded has about 840mg/l but is now banned. In the UK low lead petrol is available from a small number of specialist garages for classic cars which cannot run on unleaded and contains about 75mg/l.

        So while none is the best, this is a very small fraction in comparison as to what it used to be, and it also is to cover cross contamination purposes.

        • 1847953620@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          get those engines modified so they do take unleaded, shit is bad for anyone breathing it

          edit: also, I’m not sure I completely buy it. Lead was only picked as an additive because it was the cheapest available. Before it was even picked, there were other economically and mechanically viable alternatives. The commercial aircraft industry switched to a different additive seamlessly once lead was legislated away. The studies about this are abundant and easily found; sounds like some old farts just managed to squeeze by with a bogus excuse that no-one scrutinized.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Don’t know why you’re downvoted, there’s no excuse to use leaded fuel in anything.

  • 2piradians@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    11 months ago

    Losing them tons of money is the only way to make the faceless corporates pay attention and take action. I hope they do it.

  • weksa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was in Vegas last month. Uber/Lyft drivers are fed up too. One driver told me that he used to meet his goals by 11am. Because of F1 construction traffic, now he’s driving an extra 10-15 hours per day to meet those same goals. He’s gonna be out of town this F1 month, visiting a friend in another state to consider moving there.

    Life is becoming worse for the residents, while the casinos get richer.

  • XbSuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve been waiting for this race all fucking year, they better just give them what they’re asking for and not mess this up.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I totally agree, I was just making a joke because our or french friends are quite something when it comes to strikes and protest.