• lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    i wonder how’s they came up with 42.5%. why not 41.8% or 43.17%?

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say it comes from long political negociations. Every .5% is probably full of compromises between every country, political party and lobbies.

  • query@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Such a waste not supporting nuclear power since decades ago.

    Shouldn’t have renewable energy targets, but deadlines for shutting down all coal power plants, then oil, and production of fossil fuel vehicles, then a cap on the amount of natural gas that can be used.