• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That said, data centers as a whole are something like 1% of the global electricity use. So while AI may use a lot of energy relative to what you’re getting, it’s really not a ton in the grand scheme of things.

    If the goal is to reduce electricity usage, there are bigger fish to fry. If the goal is to stop the small fish from getting too large w/o providing value, then go ahead, guilt away.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, exactly my point. It’s more useful than harmful and it is a miniscule impact compared to other things. Enviro people have just latched onto AI as if it’s the greatest evil ever, with lots of embelishments and straight up lies about its power usage.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Eh, I’m not so sure about the useful vs harmful tradeoff, but it’s certainly not harming anything AFAICT. In fact, they’ll be super motivated to get cheap, reliable electricity as it grows, so expect more investments like reopening 3-mile island, solar energy storage, etc. It could end up being a net win climate-wise (probably not), but in any case, it’s not what’s causing climate change.

        If we want to address climate change, we need to address the 500lb gorillas in the room: transportation. Anything else, IMO, is a distraction.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Again, 5x the electricity of a single google search is nothing and it produces incredible results. Overall it is a tiny blip compared to anything else.