• cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interestingly, this CPU performs noticeably better under Linux than under Windows 11

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Microshit wasting money ruining windows and spending no cash on optimization. Corpo leadership for ya in today’s America.

      Parasites just looting.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        No need to optimize when you can just push people to upgrade their hardware more frequently so you make fat stacks of cash from OEM’s.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s gotten to the point though that it actually works better on older hardware as the system can’t actually fully utilise the new hardware because it’s not programmed to do that. It’s actually such a sad state of affairs. I don’t know how the Windows devs can cope anymore. If I worked on that product I would hate my life.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    So many f****** ads I gave my cell phone cancer.

    TMA:DR

    When taking the geometric mean of 73 benchmarks run for this comparison, upgrading from the Ryzen 9 7950X to 9950X on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS yielded a 14% generational improvement with this set of cross-platform applications/benchmarks while under Windows 11 was a 10% generational improvement. The raw performance of Ubuntu Linux on the AMD Ryzen processors also was greater overall to the extent of the Ryzen 9 7950X to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS nearly matching the Ryzen 9 9950X on Microsoft Windows 11.

  • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is because M$s scheduler sucks, and needs to be updated for the new AMD CPUs. Happened in the past with other Ryzen releases.

  • hackerwacker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why don’t they reverse the axis on the “less if better” graphs so you don’t have to look at the note on every graph…

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I read an article recently comparing w10 and w11 performance and the numbers were basically the same as this. No gamer should be running w11.

  • dukatos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The best thing here is Michael tested it with kernel 6.8.0, which is released in march - so there is no special optimization for new CPU in it. And, it still runs faster.