- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
You must log in or register to comment.
Lmfao, surely they saw this coming. Any one have a way around the pay wall?
May even be intentional. That’s a nice way to fire half your staff without actually firing anyone.
It’s a nice way to fire the the most competent half.
Thank you!
these places are telling on themselves making it a ‘requirement’. obviously it’s shittier in every way, if it was somehow exciting and fun and collaborative it would be a welcome announcement.
we need better WFH laws, this could literally revolutionize society and it’s being rolled back because some rich dickheads starting gambling on office buildings
It’s more complicated I’m some places. I believe there are places where it’s not just a fear of depreciated building value. There are literally contracts in violation because they require a certain amount of occupancy.
Oh no! Anyway….
Oh well, they can rot, too.
Oooh, business idea !
Occupancy as a service !!!
US schools have been doing that for many years. Their funding is dependent on warm body count.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
